Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Optimal eigenvalues on a metric graph with densities

Kiyan Naderi, Noema Nicolussi

TL;DR

Problem: optimize the $k$-th eigenvalue $\lambda_k(H_\mu)$ of Laplacians on a finite metric graph $G$ over probability measures $\mu$. Approach: develop a unified framework with $H_\mu$, establish the existence of minimizers, and derive geometric and spectral characterizations of the optimizers; show continuity under weak-* convergence and connect to graph resistance geometry. Key findings: the first optimum satisfies $\lambda_1^{\min}(G)=4/\operatorname{diam}_r(G)$ with two-point minimizers, and a Weyl law $\lambda_k^{\min}(G)\sim 4k^2/L(G)$ for large $k$; the path graph yields explicit spectra $\lambda_k^{\min}(P)=4k^2$ and explicit minimizers, while Dirichlet-to-Neumann and spectral-partitioning perspectives illuminate the structure. Significance: unifies discrete, Kirchhoff, and DtN operators within a spectral-optimization framework on graphs, tying extremal eigenvalues to resistance geometry and partitioning theory, with precise asymptotics and exact solutions in key cases.

Abstract

We introduce and study Laplacians on a finite metric graph endowed with generalized densities, that is, measures of finite mass. One important motivation is that this setting provides a common framework for several interesting classes of operators: discrete graph Laplacians, Kirchhoff Laplacians and Dirichlet-to-Neumann operators on graphs. Our main interest lies in spectral optimization with respect to the underlying measure. In contrast to the setting of domains and manifolds, we prove that a minimal $k$-th eigenvalue exists, whereas the corresponding maximization problem has no meaning. We then establish connections between these optimal eigenvalues and the geometry of the metric graph, including a transparent geometric characterization of the first optimal eigenvalue via the resistance metric, and a Weyl law for the higher optimal eigenvalues.

Optimal eigenvalues on a metric graph with densities

TL;DR

Problem: optimize the -th eigenvalue of Laplacians on a finite metric graph over probability measures . Approach: develop a unified framework with , establish the existence of minimizers, and derive geometric and spectral characterizations of the optimizers; show continuity under weak-* convergence and connect to graph resistance geometry. Key findings: the first optimum satisfies with two-point minimizers, and a Weyl law for large ; the path graph yields explicit spectra and explicit minimizers, while Dirichlet-to-Neumann and spectral-partitioning perspectives illuminate the structure. Significance: unifies discrete, Kirchhoff, and DtN operators within a spectral-optimization framework on graphs, tying extremal eigenvalues to resistance geometry and partitioning theory, with precise asymptotics and exact solutions in key cases.

Abstract

We introduce and study Laplacians on a finite metric graph endowed with generalized densities, that is, measures of finite mass. One important motivation is that this setting provides a common framework for several interesting classes of operators: discrete graph Laplacians, Kirchhoff Laplacians and Dirichlet-to-Neumann operators on graphs. Our main interest lies in spectral optimization with respect to the underlying measure. In contrast to the setting of domains and manifolds, we prove that a minimal -th eigenvalue exists, whereas the corresponding maximization problem has no meaning. We then establish connections between these optimal eigenvalues and the geometry of the metric graph, including a transparent geometric characterization of the first optimal eigenvalue via the resistance metric, and a Weyl law for the higher optimal eigenvalues.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 42 theorems, 219 equations)

This paper contains 21 sections, 42 theorems, 219 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.4

Let $O \subset G$ be open and $f \in H^1(G)$. The following statements are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (104)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.6
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.7
  • ...and 94 more