Phantom LAM and LLI: Resistance and Hysteresis Bias in Voltage-Curve Degradation Mode Analysis
Mohammed Asheruddin N, Matheus Leal De Souza, Thomas Holland, Catherine Folkson, Gregory Offer, Monica Marinescu
TL;DR
The paper identifies two key non-degradation sources in voltage-curve degradation-mode analysis (DMA): SOC-dependent ohmic drop and intrinsic voltage hysteresis, which can produce phantom LAM/LLI when DMA is applied to pseudo-OCV traces. It introduces an instantaneous ohmic resistance measure $R_\Omega( ext{SOC})$ from ~50 ms pulses to perform an IR correction and analyzes hysteresis as an inherent thermodynamic property, emphasizing the need for window harmonization and careful branch choice. Using two commercial 21700 cells (LG M50T and Molicel P45B) with a fixed 2.5–4.2 V window, the study demonstrates that uncorrected IR effects can misallocate degradation (e.g., underestimating PE-LAM and LLI, overestimating graphite LAM; and hysteresis-driven biases between charge vs discharge branches). The authors propose a practical protocol: apply ohmic-only correction, harmonize the voltage window, and base quantitative DMA on the discharge branch to obtain robust degradation attributions, particularly isolating Si-driven loss in Gr/SiOx anodes. This approach improves the reliability of DMA across chemistries and supports more accurate material-dissipation assessments in battery diagnostics.
Abstract
Degradation mode analysis (DMA) is widely used to decompose capacity fade into loss of lithium inventory (LLI) and loss of active material (LAM) from low-rate voltage-capacity data. Yet the measured trace is a pseudo-OCV (pOCV) that includes two non-degradation contributions: an SOC-dependent ohmic drop and intrinsic charge-discharge hysteresis, especially in graphite--silicon oxide (C/SiOx) negative electrodes. We show these can dominate attribution and generate Phantom LAM/LLI --apparent material loss created by curve registration, branch choice and voltage-windowing rather than true degradation. Using two commercial 21700 cells (LG M50T: higher resistance; Molicel P45B: lower resistance), we extract an SOC-dependent instantaneous resistance $R_Ω(\mathrm{SOC})$ from the first $\sim$50,ms pulse step and apply an IR correction to pOCV before fitting. In LG M50T, IR correction lifts the low-rate discharge pOCV by $+13$--$27$,mV with ageing; without it, PE-LAM is increasingly under-diagnosed (to $-8.80%$ relative error at late life) and LLI is suppressed (median $-3.07%$), with compensating inflation of apparent graphite loss. In P45B, on a branch-fair $3.0$--$4.2$,V window, end-of-life charge-branch DMA reports higher PE-LAM ($+3.42$,pp) and LLI ($+5.36$,pp), while the discharge branch recovers larger Si-LAM (discharge--charge difference to $+14.38$,pp). Raising the lower cutoff ($2.5$--$4.2 \rightarrow 3.0$--$4.2$,V) further under-reports Si-LAM by $13.61$,pp by removing the Si-sensitive low-voltage tail. We propose a practical protocol: correct only the instantaneous ohmic term, harmonize the voltage window, and base quantitative attribution on the discharge branch, treating anomalous/negative component LAMs on charge as allocation artefacts rather than recovery.
