Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hierarchical and ultrametric barriers in the energy landscape of jammed granular matter

Shuonan Wu, Yuchen Xie, Deng Pan, Lei Zhang, Yuliang Jin

Abstract

According to the mean-field glass theory, the (free) energy landscape of disordered systems is hierarchical and ultrametric if they belong to the full-replica-symmetry-breaking universality class. However, examining this theoretical picture in three-dimensional systems remains challenging, where the energy barriers become finite. Here, we numerically explore the energy landscape of granular models near the jamming transition using a saddle dynamics algorithm to locate both local energy minima and saddles. The multi-scale distances and energy barriers between minima are characterized by two metrics, both of which exhibit signatures of an ultrametric space. The scale-free distribution of energy barriers reveals that the landscape is hierarchical.

Hierarchical and ultrametric barriers in the energy landscape of jammed granular matter

Abstract

According to the mean-field glass theory, the (free) energy landscape of disordered systems is hierarchical and ultrametric if they belong to the full-replica-symmetry-breaking universality class. However, examining this theoretical picture in three-dimensional systems remains challenging, where the energy barriers become finite. Here, we numerically explore the energy landscape of granular models near the jamming transition using a saddle dynamics algorithm to locate both local energy minima and saddles. The multi-scale distances and energy barriers between minima are characterized by two metrics, both of which exhibit signatures of an ultrametric space. The scale-free distribution of energy barriers reveals that the landscape is hierarchical.
Paper Structure (2 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 2 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Energy landscape and pathway map. (a) A schematic multi-scale energy landscape. The inter-minima distance $d$ and barrier height $\Delta E$ both indicate the multi-scale nature of the landscape. (b) The pathway map of a two-scale, two-dimensional energy surface $E(x,y)$. The expression of $E(x,y)$ is shown in Supplemental Material (SM) Sec. S1. (c) Tree representation of the pathway map. We only show the stationary points in the three red dashed boxes.
  • Figure 2: Statistical properties of distances and energy barriers measured from the native pathway map (without reconstruction). (a) The deviation of $d$ from perfect ultrametricity, $\mathcal{D}(\tilde{p})$. Data are obtained for particles with Harmonic interactions. (b) The probability density $f(E_{01})$ follows a power law with an exponent of about −2/3. (c) The relation between $E_{01}$ and $d_{01}$ reveals a power law with an exponent of about 4. (d) The probability density of $d_{01}$ compared to $f(d_{01}) \sim d_{01}^{1/3}$. Data in (b-d) are obtained for Hertzian systems with $N=64$ particles.
  • Figure 3: Reconstruction of the pathway map with minimum energy pathways. (a) A schematic example of finding the min-max pathway $L_{\rm max}^{\rm min}(1,8)$ between two minima (1,8) from the native pathway map (from left to right). The matrix and tree representations of (b) $\Delta E$ and (c) $d^{<}$ on a set of local minima, organized using the clustering algorithm. The color scales with the corresponding value.
  • Figure 4: Statistical properties of $\Delta E$. (a) Data of $P_>(\Delta E_{\rm c})$ and (inset) $f(\Delta E)$, for systems with $N=64$ particles. (b) Correspondence between $\Delta E_{\rm c}$ and $d_{\rm c}$.