Making Quantum Accessible: A Seven-Category Framework for K-12 Quantum Education
Rhea Fernandez, Sarah Hagstrom, Liesel Malanos, Lachlan McGinness, Madeline Mitchell, Saskia Schultz, Elizabeth Sexton
TL;DR
The paper maps current pre-tertiary quantum education methods through a literature review and expert interviews, and presents a seven-category framework (Historical Development, Defamiliarisation, Quantum Picturalism, Spin First, Many Paths, Game-Based, Einstein-First) to classify teaching approaches. It analyzes the advantages and limitations of each method and discusses practical implications for curriculum design and teacher preparation. The work enables educators to select diverse, accessible strategies, preventing reinvention while highlighting gaps and areas for integration. It also suggests extending the framework to a two-dimensional model that aligns content with instructional methods. Overall, the study offers a structured, evidence-informed resource to broaden and improve K–12 quantum education.
Abstract
We conducted a literature review and expert interviews to determine the most common methods being used to teach quantum physics and quantum computing concepts to primary and secondary students. Based on the findings of this review, we provide a framework of seven categories of teaching approaches for teaching mathematically accessible quantum concepts; they are Defamiliarization, Quantum Picturalism, Spin-First Approach, Einstein-First Approach, Many Paths Approach, Historical Development Approach and Game-based Quantum Learning. We summarise each of these teaching methods and overview their advantages and disadvantages of each method. Our framework makes it easy for physics educators to embrace the diverse methods of teaching quantum physics and quantum computing at the primary and secondary level.
