Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Stochastic homogenization of coarse-grained elliptic equations

Aidan Lau

TL;DR

The article develops quenched stochastic homogenization for divergence-form elliptic equations with stationary ergodic coefficients that may be degenerate or singular, by introducing coarse-grained ellipticity and a decomposition a = s + k. It constructs coarse-grained matrices from a variational energy $J(U,p,q)$, proves their convergence via an ergodic theorem, and shows that the homogenization error vanishes under a strong coarse-grained ellipticity condition, yielding almost sure homogenization for Dirichlet problems. A key contribution is a deterministic, scale-aware error bound in terms of coarse-grained constants, together with Besov-type and $L^p$ integrability criteria that guarantee the ellipticity hypothesis. The results unify and extend prior work by AK.HC and related authors, providing an alternative coarse-graining criterion and applicable homogenization theory for irregular coefficient fields with rigorous quenched guarantees and energy-based control. This framework advances the understanding of large-scale regularity and homogenization for complex random media and informs applications where ellipticity may fail pointwise but persists in a coarse-grained sense.

Abstract

We prove quenched stochastic homogenization for divergence-form elliptic equations, under the assumption that the coefficients are stationary, ergodic, integrable, and satisfy a coarse-grained ellipticity assumption. The ellipticity assumption requires that the coefficients remain bounded in a negative regularity sense on large scales. As a corollary, we recover a sufficient joint integrability condition on the symmetric and skew-symmetric parts of the coefficient field.

Stochastic homogenization of coarse-grained elliptic equations

TL;DR

The article develops quenched stochastic homogenization for divergence-form elliptic equations with stationary ergodic coefficients that may be degenerate or singular, by introducing coarse-grained ellipticity and a decomposition a = s + k. It constructs coarse-grained matrices from a variational energy , proves their convergence via an ergodic theorem, and shows that the homogenization error vanishes under a strong coarse-grained ellipticity condition, yielding almost sure homogenization for Dirichlet problems. A key contribution is a deterministic, scale-aware error bound in terms of coarse-grained constants, together with Besov-type and integrability criteria that guarantee the ellipticity hypothesis. The results unify and extend prior work by AK.HC and related authors, providing an alternative coarse-graining criterion and applicable homogenization theory for irregular coefficient fields with rigorous quenched guarantees and energy-based control. This framework advances the understanding of large-scale regularity and homogenization for complex random media and informs applications where ellipticity may fail pointwise but persists in a coarse-grained sense.

Abstract

We prove quenched stochastic homogenization for divergence-form elliptic equations, under the assumption that the coefficients are stationary, ergodic, integrable, and satisfy a coarse-grained ellipticity assumption. The ellipticity assumption requires that the coefficients remain bounded in a negative regularity sense on large scales. As a corollary, we recover a sufficient joint integrability condition on the symmetric and skew-symmetric parts of the coefficient field.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 25 theorems, 223 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume $\mathbb{P}$ satisfies $\mathbb{Z}^d$-stationarity a.stationarity, ergodicity a.ergodicity, the minimal moment condition a.finite.E, and the coarse-grained ellipticity condition a.ellipticity. Let $s$ and $t$ be as in a.ellipticity. There exists a matrix $\accentset{}{\mathbf{a}}\in\mathbb{R} such that, for every bounded domain $U\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ which is either $C^{1,1}$ or convex a

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Example 1.4
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • ...and 36 more