How physics got its right hand: The origins of chiral conventions in electromagnetism
Tyler McMaken
TL;DR
This paper investigates the origins of the standard right-handed conventions in electromagnetism, notably why counterclockwise rotation is defined as positive and how magnetic polarity is established, by tracing historical developments from polar coordinates to Maxwell's consolidation via the London Mathematical Society in 1871. Using historical sources and concrete examples such as Faraday's law $\mathcal{E}=-\frac{d}{dt}\iint_\Sigma \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{A}$, it shows how choices about coordinate orientation, charge sign, and magnetism polarity would alter sign conventions across Maxwell's equations. It documents the sequence from Newton's early polar-coordinate usage, Franklin's charge definition, Faraday's and Ampère's insights on magnetism, to Maxwell's push for a unified vector-analytic framework, culminating in the LMS decision and Maxwell's subsequent standardization of conventions. The work emphasizes the pedagogical and communicative implications of conventions in physics, illustrating how definitions shape learning, collaboration, and scientific progress.
Abstract
Why do physicists almost universally take the direction of positive rotation to be counterclockwise, and three-dimensional coordinates to be right-handed? This paper traces the historical development of these chiral conventions, with an emphasis on the physical quantity whose direction became the focal point of this discussion in the mid-1800s, the magnetic field. Though these standards are often reduced to mere mathematical, inconsequential choices, an analysis of the impact of Newton, Maxwell, the London Mathematical Society, and others toward the subject can enhance classroom discussion, not only as a contextual sidebar, but also by emphasizing the influence conventions in physics can have on pedagogy, communication, and scientific advancement.
