Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Monitoring and Evaluating Astronomy-for-Development Initiatives

Joyful E. Mdhluli

TL;DR

The paper addresses the challenge of measuring impact in astronomy-for-development initiatives by proposing a structured Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework that distinguishes continuous monitoring from evaluative assessment. It adapts the IAU OAD approach to emphasize a clear theory of change, appropriate indicators, and a mix of evaluation types (process, feasibility, impact/outcome, economic, and summative) to suit project scope and resources. Practical guidance and reflective questions are provided to help teams design evidence-informed, community-driven projects aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The work aims to improve accountability, learning, and scalability of Astro4Dev interventions, supporting better decision-making and demonstration of impact to funders and policymakers.

Abstract

This paper serves as a practical guide for individuals and organisations seeking to design, implement, and evaluate astronomy-for-development initiatives, as well as those preparing proposals for the International Astronomical Union's Office of Astronomy for Development (IAU OAD) annual Call for Proposals. The paper aims to outline how systematic evidence collection can strengthen project design, enhance accountability, and increase the likelihood of measurable impact. It explains the distinction between monitoring and evaluation, provides guidance on when and how evaluation should be undertaken, and summarises key evaluation types - process, feasibility, impact, outcome, economic, and summative, relevant to astronomy-based interventions. In addition to conceptual discussion, the paper presents a set of practical steps, reflective questions, and examples to help project teams develop a clear theory of change, define appropriate indicators, and anticipate risks and unintended consequences. By contextualising M&E within the broader goals of the OAD and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this work aims to empower practitioners to create evidence-informed, community-driven, and sustainable astronomy-for-development projects that deliver both local and global benefit.

Monitoring and Evaluating Astronomy-for-Development Initiatives

TL;DR

The paper addresses the challenge of measuring impact in astronomy-for-development initiatives by proposing a structured Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework that distinguishes continuous monitoring from evaluative assessment. It adapts the IAU OAD approach to emphasize a clear theory of change, appropriate indicators, and a mix of evaluation types (process, feasibility, impact/outcome, economic, and summative) to suit project scope and resources. Practical guidance and reflective questions are provided to help teams design evidence-informed, community-driven projects aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The work aims to improve accountability, learning, and scalability of Astro4Dev interventions, supporting better decision-making and demonstration of impact to funders and policymakers.

Abstract

This paper serves as a practical guide for individuals and organisations seeking to design, implement, and evaluate astronomy-for-development initiatives, as well as those preparing proposals for the International Astronomical Union's Office of Astronomy for Development (IAU OAD) annual Call for Proposals. The paper aims to outline how systematic evidence collection can strengthen project design, enhance accountability, and increase the likelihood of measurable impact. It explains the distinction between monitoring and evaluation, provides guidance on when and how evaluation should be undertaken, and summarises key evaluation types - process, feasibility, impact, outcome, economic, and summative, relevant to astronomy-based interventions. In addition to conceptual discussion, the paper presents a set of practical steps, reflective questions, and examples to help project teams develop a clear theory of change, define appropriate indicators, and anticipate risks and unintended consequences. By contextualising M&E within the broader goals of the OAD and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this work aims to empower practitioners to create evidence-informed, community-driven, and sustainable astronomy-for-development projects that deliver both local and global benefit.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 1 figure, 1 table.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Practical steps to Monitoring and Evaluation.