About Time: Model-free Reinforcement Learning with Timed Reward Machines
Anirban Majumdar, Ritam Raha, Rajarshi Roy, David Parker, Marta Kwiatkowska
TL;DR
The paper introduces Timed Reward Machines (TRMs) to express timing-sensitive, history-dependent rewards in reinforcement learning. It develops model-free Q-learning algorithms by constructing cross-product MDPs that combine the environment with TRMs under digital and real-time semantics, leveraging region/corner abstractions and counterfactual-imagining to manage timing constraints. Empirical results on Taxi and Frozen Lake show that TRMs improve learning when timing matters and that corner-point abstractions often outperform naive discretizations. The work lays groundwork for time-aware RL and points to future extensions to continuous-time models and priced zones for richer timing specifications.
Abstract
Reward specification plays a central role in reinforcement learning (RL), guiding the agent's behavior. To express non-Markovian rewards, formalisms such as reward machines have been introduced to capture dependencies on histories. However, traditional reward machines lack the ability to model precise timing constraints, limiting their use in time-sensitive applications. In this paper, we propose timed reward machines (TRMs), which are an extension of reward machines that incorporate timing constraints into the reward structure. TRMs enable more expressive specifications with tunable reward logic, for example, imposing costs for delays and granting rewards for timely actions. We study model-free RL frameworks (i.e., tabular Q-learning) for learning optimal policies with TRMs under digital and real-time semantics. Our algorithms integrate the TRM into learning via abstractions of timed automata, and employ counterfactual-imagining heuristics that exploit the structure of the TRM to improve the search. Experimentally, we demonstrate that our algorithm learns policies that achieve high rewards while satisfying the timing constraints specified by the TRM on popular RL benchmarks. Moreover, we conduct comparative studies of performance under different TRM semantics, along with ablations that highlight the benefits of counterfactual-imagining.
