Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Intersecting well approximable and missing digit sets

Bing Li, Sanju Velani, Bo Wang

TL;DR

This work analyzes the size and dimension of the intersection between ψ-well-approximable numbers $W_t(\psi)$ and missing-digit self-similar sets $C(b,D)$. It establishes a general bound $\dim_{\rm H}(W_t(\psi)\cap C(b,D)) \le \dim_{\rm H}(W_t(\psi))\cdot\dim_{\rm H}(C(b,D))$ and, under additional restrictions when $b$ and $t$ share prime divisors, a zero-measure criterion and a sharp dimension formula that refines prior results. Crucially, it shows that the product formula for the intersection’s dimension can fail when $b$ and $t$ are multiplicatively independent, providing explicit constructions that disprove the LLW product conjecture. A key corollary extends the dimension bound to the intersection with any self-similar set, highlighting a universal upper bound that improves earlier estimates. The results close gaps in the LLW framework and illuminate the intricate interaction between Diophantine approximation and fractal geometry.

Abstract

Let $b\geq3$ be an integer and $C(b,D)$ be the set of real numbers in $[0,1]$ whose $b$-ary expansion consists of digits restricted to a given set $D\subseteq\{0,\ldots,b-1\}$. Given an integer $t\geq2$ and a real, positive function $ψ$, let $W_{t}(ψ)$ denote the set of $x$ in $[0,1]$ for which $|x-p/t^{n}|<ψ(n)$ for infinitely many $(p,n)\in\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{N}$. We prove a general Hausdorff dimension result concerning the intersection of $W_{t}(ψ)$ with an arbitrary self similar set which implies that $\dim_{\rm H}(W_{t}(ψ)\cap C(b,D))\le\dim_{\rm H}W_{t}(ψ)\times \dim_{\rm H}C(b,D)$. When $b$ and $t$ have the same prime divisors, under certain restrictions on the digit set $D$, we give a sufficient condition for the Hausdorff measure of $W_{t}(ψ)\cap C(b,D)$ to be zero. This closes a gap in a result of Li, Li and Wu \cite{LLW2025} and shows that the dimension of the intersection can be strictly less than the product of the dimensions. The latter disproves the product conjecture of Li, Li and Wu.

Intersecting well approximable and missing digit sets

TL;DR

This work analyzes the size and dimension of the intersection between ψ-well-approximable numbers and missing-digit self-similar sets . It establishes a general bound and, under additional restrictions when and share prime divisors, a zero-measure criterion and a sharp dimension formula that refines prior results. Crucially, it shows that the product formula for the intersection’s dimension can fail when and are multiplicatively independent, providing explicit constructions that disprove the LLW product conjecture. A key corollary extends the dimension bound to the intersection with any self-similar set, highlighting a universal upper bound that improves earlier estimates. The results close gaps in the LLW framework and illuminate the intricate interaction between Diophantine approximation and fractal geometry.

Abstract

Let be an integer and be the set of real numbers in whose -ary expansion consists of digits restricted to a given set . Given an integer and a real, positive function , let denote the set of in for which for infinitely many . We prove a general Hausdorff dimension result concerning the intersection of with an arbitrary self similar set which implies that . When and have the same prime divisors, under certain restrictions on the digit set , we give a sufficient condition for the Hausdorff measure of to be zero. This closes a gap in a result of Li, Li and Wu \cite{LLW2025} and shows that the dimension of the intersection can be strictly less than the product of the dimensions. The latter disproves the product conjecture of Li, Li and Wu.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 12 theorems, 177 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose $b$ and $t$ have the same prime divisors and that $\psi:\mathbb{N}\to(0,\infty)$ satisfies $\psi(n)\le b^{-\lceil\alpha_{2}n\rceil-1}$ for $n$ sufficiently large.

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 1.2
  • Corollary 1.1
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Remark 1.3
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • ...and 16 more