Talent is Everywhere, Mobility is Not: Mapping the Topological Anchors of Educational Pathways
Francisco Ríos, Fernanda Muñoz, Valeria Bravo, Gonzalo Castillo, Inti Núñez, Jorge Maluenda-Albornoz, Carlos Navarrete
TL;DR
The study analyzes administrative records for 2.7 million Chilean students (2021–2024) to map post-secondary trajectories using unsupervised clustering, revealing seven distinct student archetypes within an Educational Space defined by academic performance and family background. PCA and k-means clustering uncover structured regions in this space, linking cluster position to enrollment patterns and cross-regional migration. A logistic regression with cluster fixed effects shows that higher academic performance increases migration propensity, but socioeconomic status strongly moderates this relationship, with high-SES students more likely to relocate to capital institutions. The approach provides a scalable, data-driven framework for diagnosing structural constraints on educational mobility and guiding policy to reduce spatial and social inequality, with implications transferable to other countries using administrative data.
Abstract
The relationship between socioeconomic background, academic performance, and post-secondary educational outcomes remains a significant concern for policymakers and researchers globally. While the literature often relies on self-reported or aggregate data, its ability to trace individual pathways limits these studies. Here, we analyze administrative records from over 2.7 million Chilean students (2021-2024) to map post-secondary trajectories across the entire education system. Using machine learning, we identify seven distinct student archetypes and introduce the Educational Space, a two-dimensional representation of students based on academic performance and family background. We show that, despite comparable academic abilities, students follow markedly different enrollment patterns, career choices, and cross-regional migration behaviors depending on their socioeconomic origins and position in the educational space. For instance, high-achieving, low-income students tend to remain in regional institutions, while their affluent peers are more geographically mobile. Our approach provides a scalable framework applicable worldwide for using administrative data to uncover structural constraints on educational mobility and inform policies aimed at reducing spatial and social inequality.
