Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lower bounds on the independence number of a graph in terms of degrees

Jochen Harant, Ingo Schiermeyer

TL;DR

This paper addresses lower bounds on the independence number $\alpha(G)$ for graphs with bounded maximum degree $\Delta$, expressing bounds as linear combinations of the degree-class counts $|V_i(G)|$ with coefficients determined recursively. Building on the Kelly–Postle bound, it proves $\alpha(G) \ge \sum_{i=1}^{\Delta} c_i|V_i(G)|$ where $c_\Delta=1/\Delta$ and $i c_i + c_{i+1}=1$, and demonstrates that adding an additive term $\varepsilon|V_j(G)|$ is not universally valid. The authors introduce refined coefficients $d_i$ tied to the Euler number $e$, yielding sharper bounds in many cases, and provide concrete constructions (e.g., a graph $G^*$) to exhibit improvements over earlier bounds and to illustrate the tightness and noncomparability of different coefficient schemes. The work further establishes optimality aspects (Corollary C1, Theorem T3) and extends the framework with additional lower bounds, supported by detailed proofs in the accompanying section.

Abstract

Given an integer $Δ\ge 3$, let ${\cal G}_{Δ}$ be the set of connected graphs $G\neq K_{Δ+1}$ with maximum degree $Δ$ and, for $i=1,\cdots, Δ$, let $V_i(G)$ be the set of vertices of $G$ of degree $i$. Using a result of T. Kelly and L. Postle, we prove that $\sum\limits_{i=1}^Δc_i|V_i(G)|$ is a lower bound on the independence number $α(G)$ of $G\in {\cal G}_Δ$, where $c_Δ=\frac{1}Δ$ and $ic_{i}=1-c_{i+1}$ for $i=1,\cdots,Δ-1$. Moreover, if $\varepsilon >0$ and $j\in \{1,\cdots, Δ\}$, then the inequality $α(G)\ge \varepsilon|V_j(G)|+\sum\limits_{i=1}^Δc_i|V_i(G)|$ does not hold for infinitely many graphs $G\in {\cal G}_Δ$. Finally, further lower bounds on $α(G)$ in terms of degrees of $G$ are presented.

Lower bounds on the independence number of a graph in terms of degrees

TL;DR

This paper addresses lower bounds on the independence number for graphs with bounded maximum degree , expressing bounds as linear combinations of the degree-class counts with coefficients determined recursively. Building on the Kelly–Postle bound, it proves where and , and demonstrates that adding an additive term is not universally valid. The authors introduce refined coefficients tied to the Euler number , yielding sharper bounds in many cases, and provide concrete constructions (e.g., a graph ) to exhibit improvements over earlier bounds and to illustrate the tightness and noncomparability of different coefficient schemes. The work further establishes optimality aspects (Corollary C1, Theorem T3) and extends the framework with additional lower bounds, supported by detailed proofs in the accompanying section.

Abstract

Given an integer , let be the set of connected graphs with maximum degree and, for , let be the set of vertices of of degree . Using a result of T. Kelly and L. Postle, we prove that is a lower bound on the independence number of , where and for . Moreover, if and , then the inequality does not hold for infinitely many graphs . Finally, further lower bounds on in terms of degrees of are presented.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 9 theorems, 6 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

If $G$ is a graph and $g:V(G) \rightarrow R$ such that $g(v)\le \frac{2}{2d_G(v)+1}$ for each $v\in V(G)$ and $\sum\limits_{v\in K}g(v)\le 1$ for each clique $K\subseteq V(G)$, then

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • proof : Proof of Corollary \ref{['C1']}
  • Lemma 1
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['L1']}.
  • Lemma 2
  • ...and 7 more