Percolation on random graphs
Remco van der Hofstad
TL;DR
This paper surveys how percolation behaves on finite random graphs, emphasizing the phase transition near criticality and how inhomogeneity shapes scaling. It develops and contrasts results for rank-1 models (configuration models and rank-1 IRGs) with those for dynamic, growing graphs, using Janson’s construction and exploration processes to derive scaling limits in diverse moment regimes. A core contribution is the delineation of multiple universality classes: finite-third-moment, infinite-third-moment (heavy-tailed), and infinite-variance degree regimes, each with distinct limiting objects (Brownian excursions, thinned Lévy processes, tiny giants) and explicit critical windows. The analysis shows how local limits, two-step connection structures, and component explorations drive global connectivity properties, providing precise asymptotics for the largest components, susceptibilities, and the emergence of giant components across static rank-1 and dynamic network models.
Abstract
Percolation is a model for random damage to a network. It is one of the simplest models that displays a phase transition: when the network is severely damaged, it falls apart in many small connected components, while if the damage is light, connectivity is hardly affected. We study the location and nature of the phase transition on random graphs. In particular, we focus on the connectivity structure close to, or below, criticality, where components display intricate scaling behaviour such that a typical connected component has bounded size, while the average and maximal connected component sizes grow like powers of the network size. We review the recent progress that has been made in two important settings: random graphs whose expected adjacency matrix is close to being rank-1, the most prominent examples being the configuration model and rank-1 inhomogeneous random graphs, and dynamic random graphs, i.e., random graphs that grow with time, such as uniform and preferential attachment models. Remarkably, these two settings behave rather differently. In all cases, the inhomogeneity of the underlying random graph on which we perform percolation is of crucial importance.
