Table of Contents
Fetching ...

All Entangled States are Nonlocal and Self-Testable in the Broadcast Scenario

Pavel Sekatski, Jef Pauwels

Abstract

Entanglement and Bell nonlocality are known to be inequivalent: there exist entangled states that admit a local hidden-variable model for all local measurements. Here we show that this gap disappears in a minimal broadcast extension of the Bell scenario. Assuming only the validity of quantum theory, we prove that for every entangled state $ρ_{AB}$ there exist local broadcasting maps and local measurements such that the resulting four--partite correlations cannot be reproduced by any broadcast network whose source is separable across the $A|B$ cut. Thus, all entangled states are broadcast nonlocal in quantum theory. In addition, we show that all (also mixed) multipartite states can be broadcast-self-tested, according to a natural operational definition.

All Entangled States are Nonlocal and Self-Testable in the Broadcast Scenario

Abstract

Entanglement and Bell nonlocality are known to be inequivalent: there exist entangled states that admit a local hidden-variable model for all local measurements. Here we show that this gap disappears in a minimal broadcast extension of the Bell scenario. Assuming only the validity of quantum theory, we prove that for every entangled state there exist local broadcasting maps and local measurements such that the resulting four--partite correlations cannot be reproduced by any broadcast network whose source is separable across the cut. Thus, all entangled states are broadcast nonlocal in quantum theory. In addition, we show that all (also mixed) multipartite states can be broadcast-self-tested, according to a natural operational definition.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 1 theorem, 37 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 1

The maximal score $\mathcal{B}=6\sqrt{2}$ observed by $A_2$ and $A_1$ self-tests the following quantum model. There exist local unitaries $U_i:A_i A_i'A_i"\to \bar{A}_i A_i'A_i"$ such that where the (unnormalised) states satisfy $\|\ket{\xi_0}\|^2+\|\ket{\xi_1}\|^2=1$ and we used the compact notation $\top_{\!k} = $.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Modifications of the standard bipartite single-round Bell scenario, aiming at device-independent entanglement detection of the source $\rho_{AB}$ (blue). The auxiliary devices (black) are untrusted, but assumed to follow quantum mechanics. (a) Sequential-measurement scenario: each party applies a sequence of instruments on the received system. (b) Network-embedding scenario: the source $\rho_{AB}$ is embedded in a larger network with two additional independent sources. (c) Broadcasting scenario: each party applies a local operation that splits the received system into two subsystems, $A_1,A_2$ and $B_1,B_2$.
  • Figure 2: a) Honest isometry in the broadcasting network enabling the device-independent entanglement detection of any state $\rho_{AB}$. Each local isometry routes the incoming system $A$ ($B$) to $A_1$ ($B_1$), while distributing a maximally entangled state $\Phi^+$ between $A_1$ ($B_1$) and $A_2$ ($B_2$). b) Subsystem dictionary for Alice after the Bowles self-test (Eq. \ref{['eq: ST']}). Both physical systems $A_1,A_2$ split into three subsystems. The qubits $A_1',A_2'$ carry an EPR pair $|\Phi^+\rangle$. The remaining systems are in a state $\ket{\xi}=\sum_{k=0}^1 \ket{\xi_k}_{\bar{A}_1 \bar{A}_2 BE}\ket{kk}_{A_1"A_2"}$, where the flag qubits $A_1",A_2"$ label the transposition-branch, while the systems $\bar{A}_1, \bar{A}_2$ collect the remaining degrees of freedom. Up to transposition controlled by the flag qubit $A_2"$, the measurement device ${\tt A}_2^{(a_2|x_2)}$ performs the three Pauli measurements of the qubit $A_2'$. Certification of this measurement and of the EPR pair provides a device-independent extracted qubit register $A_1'$, which serves as a certified quantum subsystem for subsequent entanglement-detection and self-testing arguments in the broadcast network. c) The extraction instrument $\{\mathcal{E}_A^{(a_1)}: A \to A_2' A_2"\}$, producing two qubits and a classical outcome $a_1$ from the input system $A$.

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • Lemma 1: The Bowles self-test, Lemma 1 in bowles2018vsupic2023quantum