Table of Contents
Fetching ...
Paper

Irregular Stanley sequences plausibly do not have growth $Θ(n^2/\log n)$

Abstract

Stanley sequences starting from the set where is a positive integer have long been conjectured to be divided into two types: the "regular" type where the growth rate is , and the "irregular" type where the growth rate is thought to be . A paradigmatic case of a candidate irregular type is , although to date no value of has been proven to have such a growth rate. Here, we provide strong numerical evidence against this conjectured growth rate for . Specifically, for , it seems plausible that the upper bound is but that the lower bound is in fact for some . This appears to be because the sequence is not totally "random" as has been assumed. Limitations of the numerical method here is discussed.