Stability of the symmetry-protected topological phase and Ising transitions in a disordered U(1) quantum link model on a ladder
Mykhailo V. Rakov, Luca Tagliacozzo, Maciej Lewenstein, Jakub Zakrzewski, Titas Chanda
TL;DR
The paper investigates the stability of Ising-type criticality and a symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phase in a disordered two-leg ladder quantum link model (QLM) that realizes a U(1) lattice gauge theory. Using density-matrix renormalization group techniques and finite-size scaling of entanglement entropy and magnetizations, it shows that the disorder-free system hosts Ising transitions with central charge $c=1/2$ and that rung-bond disorder preserves these Ising transitions up to moderate disorder, while zero-mass ($m=0$) supports a robust SPT phase. A field-theoretic argument based on Majorana modes explains the apparent violation of the Harris criterion for Ising criticality under rung disorder: the disorder couples to a gapped symmetric sector, leaving the gapless antisymmetric sector to govern the critical behavior. When disorder is applied to the leg bonds, Ising criticality is destroyed at $m>0$, whereas the $m=0$ SPT phase remains robust, indicating a delicate interplay between disorder type and symmetry in quasi-1D lattice gauge theories.
Abstract
We revisit the U(1) quantum link model in a ladder geometry, finding, by finite-size scaling, that the critical exponent $ν=1$ and the central charge $c=1/2$ are consistent with the Ising universality class for all phase transitions observed. A blind application of the Harris criterion would suggest that this criticality is lost in the presence of the disorder. It turns out not to be the case. For the disorder affecting ladder's rung hoppings only, we have found that the transitions survive disappearing only for quite strong disorder. The disorder in the ladder's legs destroys the nonzero mass phase criticality, while the symmetry-protected topological phase for zero mass survives a small disorder. The observed robustness against disorder is explained qualitatively using field-theoretic arguments.
