Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Neutrino mass constraints in the context of 4-parameter dark energy equation of state and DESI DR2 observations

Gowri S Nair, Amlan Chakraborty, Luca Amendola, Subinoy Das

TL;DR

This study reexamines cosmological constraints on the total neutrino mass $\sum m_\nu$ in the context of a flexible four-parameter dark-energy equation of state (4pDE), extending beyond the CPL parametrization. Using a modified CLASS implementation and a COBAYA-MCMC analysis of Planck 2018, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+, the authors quantify how 4pDE alters degeneracies with neutrino mass and tightens constraints on late-time expansion. They find $\sum m_\nu < 0.101$ eV (95% C.L.) in the 4pDE framework, softer than the $\Lambda$CDM bound but still stronger than CPL-based DESI analyses, with the present-day EoS $w_0$ tightly constrained and a reconstructed $w(z)$ showing a possible phantom-crossing near $z\sim0.5$ in the best-fit model. Although the 4pDE model marginally improves the fit to the data ($\Delta\chi^2_{\min} = -7.3$), the Akaike Information Criterion indicates only weak evidence in its favor ($\Delta\mathrm{AIC} = +0.7$), underscoring that current data do not decisively prefer a dynamical dark energy scenario despite its impact on neutrino mass inference.

Abstract

Cosmological constraints on the total neutrino mass, $\sum m_ν$, are strongly shaped by assumptions about the dark-energy equation of state due to the well-known degeneracy between massive neutrinos and late-time cosmic acceleration. In this work, we move beyond the two-parameter Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) form adopted in recent DESI analyses and re-examine neutrino mass constraints using a flexible four-parameter dark energy equation of state (4pDE). We implement the 4pDE model in a modified version of CLASS and perform a full MCMC analysis using Planck, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+ data. Relative to our previous 4pDE study based on pre-DESI BAO datasets, the inclusion of DESI DR2 substantially tightens the constraints on the transition parameters while still yielding a relaxed neutrino-mass bound compared to $Λ$CDM, $\sum m_ν< 0.101$ eV ($95\%$ C.L.). This upper limit is more stringent than the DESI DR2 constraint obtained within the $w_0w_a$CDM framework. From the best-fit parameters, we reconstruct the evolution of the 4pDE equation of state along with both $68\%$ and $95\%$C.L. We do not find a statistically significant phantom-crossing at $z \sim 0.5$, consistent with the conclusion from the DESI collaboration; at higher redshifts, the reconstructed $w(z)$ follows the CPL evolution and deviates only at low redshift. Additionally we also find reduction in $Δχ^2_{\rm min}=-7.3$ compared to $Λ$CDM model.

Neutrino mass constraints in the context of 4-parameter dark energy equation of state and DESI DR2 observations

TL;DR

This study reexamines cosmological constraints on the total neutrino mass in the context of a flexible four-parameter dark-energy equation of state (4pDE), extending beyond the CPL parametrization. Using a modified CLASS implementation and a COBAYA-MCMC analysis of Planck 2018, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+, the authors quantify how 4pDE alters degeneracies with neutrino mass and tightens constraints on late-time expansion. They find eV (95% C.L.) in the 4pDE framework, softer than the CDM bound but still stronger than CPL-based DESI analyses, with the present-day EoS tightly constrained and a reconstructed showing a possible phantom-crossing near in the best-fit model. Although the 4pDE model marginally improves the fit to the data (), the Akaike Information Criterion indicates only weak evidence in its favor (), underscoring that current data do not decisively prefer a dynamical dark energy scenario despite its impact on neutrino mass inference.

Abstract

Cosmological constraints on the total neutrino mass, , are strongly shaped by assumptions about the dark-energy equation of state due to the well-known degeneracy between massive neutrinos and late-time cosmic acceleration. In this work, we move beyond the two-parameter Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) form adopted in recent DESI analyses and re-examine neutrino mass constraints using a flexible four-parameter dark energy equation of state (4pDE). We implement the 4pDE model in a modified version of CLASS and perform a full MCMC analysis using Planck, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+ data. Relative to our previous 4pDE study based on pre-DESI BAO datasets, the inclusion of DESI DR2 substantially tightens the constraints on the transition parameters while still yielding a relaxed neutrino-mass bound compared to CDM, eV ( C.L.). This upper limit is more stringent than the DESI DR2 constraint obtained within the CDM framework. From the best-fit parameters, we reconstruct the evolution of the 4pDE equation of state along with both and C.L. We do not find a statistically significant phantom-crossing at , consistent with the conclusion from the DESI collaboration; at higher redshifts, the reconstructed follows the CPL evolution and deviates only at low redshift. Additionally we also find reduction in compared to CDM model.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 7 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Two-dimensional marginalized posterior distributions of the 4pDE model parameters ($\omega_{\rm cdm}$, $H_0$, $w_0$, $w_m$, $\log_{10} (a_{\rm t})$, $\log_{10} (\Delta_{\rm de})$, and $\sum m_\nu$) obtained from our MCMC analysis for the dataset combinations of Planck, DESI DR2 BAO and Pantheon+. The contours correspond to the 68% and 95% confidence regions.
  • Figure 2: Dark energy equation of state plotted for the 4pDE model using the best-fit values obtained from MCMC analysis using Planck+DESI DR2+Pantheon+. The shaded regions indicate the obtained $1\sigma$ and $2\sigma$ confidence regions. The result is then compared with CPL parameterization obtained from DESI analysis DESI:2025zgx
  • Figure 3: $1$D posterior distributions of the neutrino mass for the $\Lambda$CDM and 4pDE models (left), and the corresponding $2$D marginalized contours between the neutrino mass and $\Omega_m$ (right). All results are obtained from MCMC analyses using the combined Planck, DESI DR2 BAO, and Pantheon+ datasets.