Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bayesian Extraction of HQET Parameters from Inclusive Semi-Leptonic Decay of the $Λ_{c}^{+}$ Baryon

Kangkang Shao, Dong Xiao

TL;DR

The paper develops a Bayesian, data-driven framework to extract rest-frame electron-energy moments from inclusive Λ_c^+ → X e^+ ν_e decays, where the laboratory spectrum is a superposition of many boosted configurations. Using a Monte Carlo–driven iterative inference, the authors unfold the Λ_c^+ rest-frame spectrum and obtain the first four electron-energy moments, complete with statistical and systematic uncertainties. They then perform a global fit within the Heavy Quark Expansion in the 1S mass scheme, including NNLO perturbative corrections and power corrections up to O(1/m_c^3), to determine the non-perturbative HQET parameters μ_π^2(Λ_c^+) and ρ_D^3(Λ_c^+) and the weak annihilation term τ_WA(Λ_c^+). The results show μ_π^2(Λ_c^+) ≈ 0.133 GeV^2, ρ_D^3(Λ_c^+) ≈ -0.000295 GeV^3, and τ_WA(Λ_c^+) ≈ -0.269 GeV^3 with quantified uncertainties, highlighting a data-driven path to charm-baryon HQET parameter extraction and potential implications for inclusive charm phenomenology and CKM determinations.

Abstract

We extract the non-perturbative Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET) parameters from the inclusive semi-leptonic decay $Λ_c^+ \to X e^+ ν_e$. Unlike charmed mesons produced near threshold, $Λ_c^+$ baryons produced in $e^+e^-$ annihilation exhibit a complex momentum distribution, making the transformation of the electron energy spectrum from the laboratory frame to the $Λ_c^+$ rest frame non-trivial. To address this, we develop a novel Bayesian inference method to reconstruct the electron energy moments in the $Λ_c^+$ rest frame. By performing a global fit of theoretical predictions in the 1S mass scheme to these extracted moments, we determine the HQET parameters $μ_π^2(Λ_c^+)$ and $ρ_D^3(Λ_c^+)$ for the first time using a purely data-driven approach.

Bayesian Extraction of HQET Parameters from Inclusive Semi-Leptonic Decay of the $Λ_{c}^{+}$ Baryon

TL;DR

The paper develops a Bayesian, data-driven framework to extract rest-frame electron-energy moments from inclusive Λ_c^+ → X e^+ ν_e decays, where the laboratory spectrum is a superposition of many boosted configurations. Using a Monte Carlo–driven iterative inference, the authors unfold the Λ_c^+ rest-frame spectrum and obtain the first four electron-energy moments, complete with statistical and systematic uncertainties. They then perform a global fit within the Heavy Quark Expansion in the 1S mass scheme, including NNLO perturbative corrections and power corrections up to O(1/m_c^3), to determine the non-perturbative HQET parameters μ_π^2(Λ_c^+) and ρ_D^3(Λ_c^+) and the weak annihilation term τ_WA(Λ_c^+). The results show μ_π^2(Λ_c^+) ≈ 0.133 GeV^2, ρ_D^3(Λ_c^+) ≈ -0.000295 GeV^3, and τ_WA(Λ_c^+) ≈ -0.269 GeV^3 with quantified uncertainties, highlighting a data-driven path to charm-baryon HQET parameter extraction and potential implications for inclusive charm phenomenology and CKM determinations.

Abstract

We extract the non-perturbative Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET) parameters from the inclusive semi-leptonic decay . Unlike charmed mesons produced near threshold, baryons produced in annihilation exhibit a complex momentum distribution, making the transformation of the electron energy spectrum from the laboratory frame to the rest frame non-trivial. To address this, we develop a novel Bayesian inference method to reconstruct the electron energy moments in the rest frame. By performing a global fit of theoretical predictions in the 1S mass scheme to these extracted moments, we determine the HQET parameters and for the first time using a purely data-driven approach.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 6 equations, 3 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: A flowchart illustrating the iterative Bayesian inference method. The process starts with an arbitrary assumption for the electron momentum probability density function (PDF) in the $\Lambda_c^+$ rest frame, which is refined by comparing the resulting simulated lab-frame PDF with experimental data. Here $f$ is the one dimensional normalized PDF of electron momentum, while $\phi$ denotes the PDF in the three momentum vector space. The $p$ and $\vec{p}$ represent the variables in the laboratory frame, whereas $p^*$ and $\vec{p}\,^*$ stand for the variables in the $\Lambda_c^+$ rest frame.
  • Figure 2: Result of the electron momentum distribution of $\Lambda_c^+ \to X e^+ \nu_e$.
  • Figure 3: Final result of the electron momentum distribution of $\Lambda_c^+ \to X e^+ \nu_e$ in the $\Lambda_c^+$ rest frame.