Table of Contents
Fetching ...

High-performance computing enabled contingency analysis for modern power networks

Alexandre Gracia-Calvo, Francesca Rossi, Eduardo Iraola, Juan Carlos Olives-Camps, Eduardo Prieto-Araujo

TL;DR

This paper tackles the computational challenge of exhaustively evaluating $N-2$ contingencies in modern power networks by integrating AC-OPF feasibility, small-signal stability, and islanding into a single probabilistic risk metric. Using HPC with PyCOMPSs, VeraGrid, and STAMP, it analyzes over 57,000 contingencies on the IEEE 118-bus system to rank component criticality via the $R_i$ index, weighted by reliability data. The results reveal that risk is highly concentrated in a small subset of transmission lines, with $N-2$ interactions playing a dominant role, offering a scalable framework for near-real-time operator support and proactive grid security. The work provides a replicable workflow for probabilistic security assessment that can guide maintenance, protection, and contingency planning in large-scale networks.

Abstract

Modern power networks face increasing vulnerability to cascading failures due to high complexity and the growing penetration of intermittent resources, necessitating rigorous security assessment beyond the conventional $N-1$ criterion. Current approaches often struggle to achieve the computational tractability required for exhaustive $N-2$ contingency analysis integrated with complex stability evaluations like small-signal stability. Addressing this computational bottleneck and the limitations of deterministic screening, this paper presents a scalable methodology for the vulnerability assessment of modern power networks, integrating $N-2$ contingency analysis with small-signal stability evaluation. To prioritize critical components, we propose a probabilistic \textbf{Risk Index ($R_i$)} that weights the deterministic \textit{severity} of a contingency (including optimal power flow divergence, islanding, and oscillatory instability) by the \textit{failure frequency} of the involved elements based on reliability data. The proposed framework is implemented using High-Performance Computing (HPC) techniques through the PyCOMPSs parallel programming library, orchestrating optimal power flow simulations (VeraGrid) and small-signal analysis (STAMP) to enable the exhaustive exploration of massive contingency sets. The methodology is validated on the IEEE 118-bus test system, processing more than \num{57000} scenarios to identify components prone to triggering cascading failures. Results demonstrate that the risk-based approach effectively isolates critical assets that deterministic $N-1$ criteria often overlook. This work establishes a replicable and efficient workflow for probabilistic security assessment, suitable for large-scale networks and capable of supporting operator decision-making in near real-time environments.

High-performance computing enabled contingency analysis for modern power networks

TL;DR

This paper tackles the computational challenge of exhaustively evaluating contingencies in modern power networks by integrating AC-OPF feasibility, small-signal stability, and islanding into a single probabilistic risk metric. Using HPC with PyCOMPSs, VeraGrid, and STAMP, it analyzes over 57,000 contingencies on the IEEE 118-bus system to rank component criticality via the index, weighted by reliability data. The results reveal that risk is highly concentrated in a small subset of transmission lines, with interactions playing a dominant role, offering a scalable framework for near-real-time operator support and proactive grid security. The work provides a replicable workflow for probabilistic security assessment that can guide maintenance, protection, and contingency planning in large-scale networks.

Abstract

Modern power networks face increasing vulnerability to cascading failures due to high complexity and the growing penetration of intermittent resources, necessitating rigorous security assessment beyond the conventional criterion. Current approaches often struggle to achieve the computational tractability required for exhaustive contingency analysis integrated with complex stability evaluations like small-signal stability. Addressing this computational bottleneck and the limitations of deterministic screening, this paper presents a scalable methodology for the vulnerability assessment of modern power networks, integrating contingency analysis with small-signal stability evaluation. To prioritize critical components, we propose a probabilistic \textbf{Risk Index ()} that weights the deterministic \textit{severity} of a contingency (including optimal power flow divergence, islanding, and oscillatory instability) by the \textit{failure frequency} of the involved elements based on reliability data. The proposed framework is implemented using High-Performance Computing (HPC) techniques through the PyCOMPSs parallel programming library, orchestrating optimal power flow simulations (VeraGrid) and small-signal analysis (STAMP) to enable the exhaustive exploration of massive contingency sets. The methodology is validated on the IEEE 118-bus test system, processing more than \num{57000} scenarios to identify components prone to triggering cascading failures. Results demonstrate that the risk-based approach effectively isolates critical assets that deterministic criteria often overlook. This work establishes a replicable and efficient workflow for probabilistic security assessment, suitable for large-scale networks and capable of supporting operator decision-making in near real-time environments.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 2 equations, 5 figures, 1 table.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Topological representation of the IEEE 118-bus test system.
  • Figure 2: Risk Index ($R_i$) for transmission lines.
  • Figure 3: Risk Index ($R_i$) for generators.
  • Figure 4: Risk Index ($R_i$) for transformers.
  • Figure 5: Combined Risk Index ($R_i$) for all elements.