Probing the Warm Dark Matter mass with [C II] intensity mapping
Elena Marcuzzo, Cristiano Porciani, Emilio Romano-Díaz, Azadeh Moradinezhad Dizgah, Prachi Khatri, Matteo Viel
TL;DR
This work investigates the potential of [CII] line-intensity mapping to constrain warm dark matter using a halo-model description of the [CII] power spectrum. By introducing two LF parameterisations (optimistic and pessimistic) and performing Bayesian inference on mock data for the Deep Spectroscopic Survey at $z\approx3.6$, the authors quantify how survey design and the faint-end slope of the [CII] LF affect constraints on $m_\mathrm{WDM}$ and its FDM counterpart. They find that, under a CDM background, the reference DSS yields 95% CL lower limits of $m_\mathrm{WDM}=1.10$ keV (optimistic LF) and $0.58$ keV (pessimistic LF), with more ambitious surveys pushing to several keV; a steeper faint-end slope can further tighten bounds. However, for realistic small-halo contributions, the [CII] PS provides limited leverage on WDM unless survey capabilities are greatly expanded and multiple redshifts/lines are combined, highlighting the value of multi-tracer LIM campaigns for competitive DM constraints.
Abstract
The nature of dark matter (DM) is still debated. While cold DM (CDM) is the standard paradigm, warm DM (WDM) may ease some small-scale tensions in the $Λ$CDM framework. Line-intensity mapping (LIM) offers a novel probe of DM properties. To explore the potential of LIM surveys in constraining the WDM particle mass ($m_\mathrm{WDM}$) by means of the [C II] power spectrum (PS), we provide forecasts for the Deep Spectroscopic Survey (DSS) at $z\simeq3.6$ and extend the analysis to larger sky coverage, higher sensitivity, and/or increased spectral resolution. We develop a formulation for the [C II] PS based on the halo-model approach, incorporating the uncertainty in the luminosity function (LF) through two alternative parameterisations. We perform a Bayesian analysis on mock data to derive constraints on $m_\mathrm{WDM}$. In a CDM universe, the DSS yields lower limits on $m_\mathrm{WDM}$ at $95\%$ credibility level (CL) of $1.10$ keV and $0.58$ keV when considering the optimistic and pessimistic LF ($α= -1.1$), respectively. Ambitious surveys can improve these figures to $5.82$ keV and $1.90$ keV, and assuming a steeper faint-end slope ($α= -1.9$) further boosts these limits. A fivefold increase in spectral resolution enhances sensitivity to the damping scale associated to redshift-space distortions, tightening the constraints on $m_\mathrm{WDM}$ by a factor of up to $\sim1.8$. Finally, Bayesian inference on mock data with $m_\mathrm{WDM}=3$ keV results in a well-constrained and unbiased posterior only in futuristic survey setups. Upcoming LIM surveys can provide meaningful limits on $m_\mathrm{WDM}$, although the negligible contribution from small haloes reduces the constraining power of the [C II] PS. Future progress will benefit from combining multiple redshifts and emission lines, opening the way to competitive constraints on the nature of DM.
