Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Testing the Distance Duality Relation with Cosmological Observations at high Redshift using Artificial Neural Network

Yukang Xie, Yang Liu, Puxun Wu, Xiangyun Fu, Nan Liang

TL;DR

This paper tests the cosmic Distance Duality Relation (DDR), η(z)=1, in a model-independent way at high redshift by reconstructing $D_L(z)$ from Pantheon+ SN Ia and $D_A(z)$ from DESI DR2 BAO and strong lensing data using an artificial neural network (ANN) framework. It employs two DDR parameterizations, η(z)=1+η_0 z and η(z)=1+η_0 z/(1+z), and calibrates the SN absolute magnitude with two priors, $M_B^{\rm SH0ES}$ and $M_B^{\rm M24}$, to explore potential departures from the standard DDR. The ANN reconstructs $m(z)$ for $0.01<z\le1.4$ and $\mu(z)$ for $z>1.4$, combining a χ^2 term with a KL-divergence loss and using full-batch training with the SiLU activation; the analysis shows DDR consistent with the null within $\sim1$–$2\sigma$ for most data combinations, with mild tensions depending on the SGL sample (C19* vs A20*) and the SN calibration. The work demonstrates a robust, model-independent DDR test leveraging high-redshift probes and outlines a path toward sub-percent precision DDR tests with upcoming surveys such as LSST, Euclid, SKA, and the Einstein Telescope.

Abstract

The cosmic Distance Duality Relation (DDR) is a fundamental prediction of metric gravity under photon number conservation. In this work, we perform a model-independent test of the DDR using Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae (SN Ia), \emph{Fermi} gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with the FULL and GOLD samples, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 2 (DR2) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, and the galaxy-scale strong gravitational lensing (SGL) system samples at high redshift $0.01 < z \lesssim 8$ using an artificial neural network (ANN) approach. Our results show that the standard DDR is consistent with cosmological observations at high redshift within the $\sim 2 σ$ confidence level.

Testing the Distance Duality Relation with Cosmological Observations at high Redshift using Artificial Neural Network

TL;DR

This paper tests the cosmic Distance Duality Relation (DDR), η(z)=1, in a model-independent way at high redshift by reconstructing from Pantheon+ SN Ia and from DESI DR2 BAO and strong lensing data using an artificial neural network (ANN) framework. It employs two DDR parameterizations, η(z)=1+η_0 z and η(z)=1+η_0 z/(1+z), and calibrates the SN absolute magnitude with two priors, and , to explore potential departures from the standard DDR. The ANN reconstructs for and for , combining a χ^2 term with a KL-divergence loss and using full-batch training with the SiLU activation; the analysis shows DDR consistent with the null within for most data combinations, with mild tensions depending on the SGL sample (C19* vs A20*) and the SN calibration. The work demonstrates a robust, model-independent DDR test leveraging high-redshift probes and outlines a path toward sub-percent precision DDR tests with upcoming surveys such as LSST, Euclid, SKA, and the Einstein Telescope.

Abstract

The cosmic Distance Duality Relation (DDR) is a fundamental prediction of metric gravity under photon number conservation. In this work, we perform a model-independent test of the DDR using Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae (SN Ia), \emph{Fermi} gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with the FULL and GOLD samples, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 2 (DR2) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, and the galaxy-scale strong gravitational lensing (SGL) system samples at high redshift using an artificial neural network (ANN) approach. Our results show that the standard DDR is consistent with cosmological observations at high redshift within the confidence level.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 13 equations, 7 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: ANN reconstructions: left panel for $m(z)$ from Pantheon+ at $0.01< z \le 1.4$; middle and right panels for GRB distance modulus $\mu(z)$ from Fermi FULL and GOLD samples at $z > 1.4$, respectively.
  • Figure 2: P1 model
  • Figure 3: P2 model
  • Figure 5: P1 model
  • Figure 6: P1 model
  • ...and 2 more figures