Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bound state in the continuum and multiple atom state transfer applications in a waveguide QED setup

Xiang Guo, Xiaojun Zhang, Mingzhu Weng, Qian Bin, Hao-di Liu, Hai-Jun Xing, Xin-You Lü, Zhihai Wang

TL;DR

This work demonstrates bound states in the continuum (BICs) in a bidirectional waveguide-QED setup where two spatially separated atomic arrays couple to a coupled-resonator waveguide with time-dependent couplings. The BICs create time-independent eigenfrequencies $\Omega_p$ and a standing-wave photonic channel between the arrays, enabling high-fidelity transfer of arbitrary single-excitation states via adiabatic and nonadiabatic protocols, with fidelities exceeding $>99\%$ and robustness to disorder and dissipation. The approach does not require nonreciprocal devices or chiral couplings, and scales to larger atomic arrays, offering a robust resource for quantum information processing in realistic waveguide platforms. By combining analytical proofs of $N_a$ BICs with numerical spectra and dynamic tunneling analyses, the paper provides a practical framework for BIC-enabled quantum state engineering in waveguide-QED systems.

Abstract

Bound states in the continuum (BICs) have been extensively exploited to enhance light--matter interactions in metamaterials, yet their emergence and utility in multi-atom waveguide platforms remain far less explored. Here we study atom--waveguide-dressed BICs in a one-dimensional coupled-resonator waveguide, where two spatially separated atomic arrays couple to distinct resonators with time-dependent strengths. We show that these BICs support a standing-wave photonic mode and enable the transfer of an arbitrary unknown quantum state between the two arrays with fidelities exceeding $99\%$. The protocol remains robust against both disorder and intrinsic dissipation. Our results establish BICs as long-lived resources for high-fidelity quantum information processing in waveguide-QED architectures.

Bound state in the continuum and multiple atom state transfer applications in a waveguide QED setup

TL;DR

This work demonstrates bound states in the continuum (BICs) in a bidirectional waveguide-QED setup where two spatially separated atomic arrays couple to a coupled-resonator waveguide with time-dependent couplings. The BICs create time-independent eigenfrequencies and a standing-wave photonic channel between the arrays, enabling high-fidelity transfer of arbitrary single-excitation states via adiabatic and nonadiabatic protocols, with fidelities exceeding and robustness to disorder and dissipation. The approach does not require nonreciprocal devices or chiral couplings, and scales to larger atomic arrays, offering a robust resource for quantum information processing in realistic waveguide platforms. By combining analytical proofs of BICs with numerical spectra and dynamic tunneling analyses, the paper provides a practical framework for BIC-enabled quantum state engineering in waveguide-QED systems.

Abstract

Bound states in the continuum (BICs) have been extensively exploited to enhance light--matter interactions in metamaterials, yet their emergence and utility in multi-atom waveguide platforms remain far less explored. Here we study atom--waveguide-dressed BICs in a one-dimensional coupled-resonator waveguide, where two spatially separated atomic arrays couple to distinct resonators with time-dependent strengths. We show that these BICs support a standing-wave photonic mode and enable the transfer of an arbitrary unknown quantum state between the two arrays with fidelities exceeding . The protocol remains robust against both disorder and intrinsic dissipation. Our results establish BICs as long-lived resources for high-fidelity quantum information processing in waveguide-QED architectures.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 34 equations, 6 figures.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Schematic of BIC-enabled state transfer between two atomic arrays in a coupled-resonator waveguide. The waveguide consists of coupled resonators with hopping strength $J$. Each array contains $N_a$ atoms and couples to the $N_1$th and $N_2$th resonators with time-dependent strengths $g(t)$ and $g'(t)$, respectively.
  • Figure 2: (a) Imaginary parts of the eigenfrequencies of $\hat{H}'(t)$ as a function of the coupling ratio $g/g'$. (b) and (c) Dynamics of the AST and NAST fidelities, respectively. We set $J=2\pi\times 200\,{\rm MHz}$, $a=0.4J$, $N_{c}=41$, $N_{a}=3$, $\Delta N=20$, $\Omega_{1}=-2J\cos(11\pi/20)$, $\Omega_{2}=0$, and $\Omega_{3}=-2J\cos(9\pi/20)$ in all panels. The remaining parameters are $T=1.6061\,{\rm \mu s}$ in (b) and $T=0.1678\,{\rm \mu s}$ in (c).
  • Figure 3: (a) Photonic dynamics during the NAST protocol. (b) NAST fidelity versus disorder strength $\delta$ for on-site frequency, inter-resonator hopping and atom-waveguide coupling disorder. (c) NAST fidelity as a function of the resonator decay rate $\kappa$ for different atomic energy-relaxation times $T_{1}$. (d) NAST fidelities for $100$ randomly sampled input states. Parameters are $J=2\pi\times200\,\mathrm{MHz}$, $a=2\pi\times80\,\mathrm{MHz}$, $T=0.1678\,\mathrm{\mu s}$, $N_{c}=41$, $\Delta N=20$, and $N_{a}=3$ in all panels. In (d), we set $T_{1}=10\,\mathrm{\mu s}$ and $\kappa=0.5\,\mathrm{MHz}$.
  • Figure S1: (a) and (b) Partial energy spectra for $N_{a}=3$ and $N_{a}=4$, respectively. Solid lines represent BICs, dash-dotted lines denote the nearest scattering states, and dashed lines indicate other scattering states.
  • Figure S2: (a) Dynamics of the NAST fidelity. (b) NAST fidelity as a function of the resonator decay rate $\kappa$ for different atomic energy-relaxation times $T_{1}$. (c) NAST fidelities for $100$ arbitrary input states. The parameters are $J=2\pi\times200\,{\rm MHz}$, $a=0.5J$, $T=0.4187\,{\rm \mu s}$, $N_{c}=101$, $\Delta N=50$, and $N_{a}=4$ in all panels. The state is chosen as $C_{1} = \sqrt{5}/5$, $C_{2} = (\sqrt{10}/5)e^{i\pi/5}$, $C_{3} = (\sqrt{5}/5)e^{i\pi/3}$, and $C_{4} = (\sqrt{5}/5)e^{i\pi/10}$ in (a) and (b). In (c), we set $T_{1}=10\,{\rm \mu s}$ and $\kappa=0.5\,{\rm MHz}$.
  • ...and 1 more figures