Sell Data to AI Algorithms Without Revealing It: Secure Data Valuation and Sharing via Homomorphic Encryption
Michael Yang, Ruijiang Gao, Zhiqiang, Zheng
TL;DR
The paper tackles Arrow’s Information Paradox in AI data markets by introducing the Trustworthy Influence Protocol (TIP), a privacy-preserving framework that enables buyers to quantify external data utility without decrypting the raw data. It combines CKKS-based homomorphic encryption with gradient-based influence functions, using low-rank gradient projections to scale to large models like LLMs. Empirical results across MNIST, BERT, and GPT-2 show encrypted valuations closely track plaintext utility with modest overhead, and healthcare/book-market simulations reveal high predictive fidelity and pronounced data-utility heterogeneity, supporting meritocratic pricing over flat-rate models. Collectively, TIP provides a scalable, cryptographically sound foundation for a private, performance-driven data economy in AI development and deployment.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of Artificial Intelligence is hindered by a fundamental friction in data markets: the value-privacy dilemma, where buyers cannot verify a dataset's utility without inspection, yet inspection may expose the data (Arrow's Information Paradox). We resolve this challenge by introducing the Trustworthy Influence Protocol (TIP), a privacy-preserving framework that enables prospective buyers to quantify the utility of external data without ever decrypting the raw assets. By integrating Homomorphic Encryption with gradient-based influence functions, our approach allows for the precise, blinded scoring of data points against a buyer's specific AI model. To ensure scalability for Large Language Models (LLMs), we employ low-rank gradient projections that reduce computational overhead while maintaining near-perfect fidelity to plaintext baselines, as demonstrated across BERT and GPT-2 architectures. Empirical simulations in healthcare and generative AI domains validate the framework's economic potential: we show that encrypted valuation signals achieve a high correlation with realized clinical utility and reveal a heavy-tailed distribution of data value in pre-training corpora where a minority of texts drive capability while the majority degrades it. These findings challenge prevailing flat-rate compensation models and offer a scalable technical foundation for a meritocratic, secure data economy.
