Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Largest acylindrical actions of free-by-cyclic groups

Monika Kudlinska, Harry Petyt

TL;DR

The paper establishes a canonical largest acylindrical action for finitely generated free-by-cyclic groups by coning off maximal product subgroups, yielding a hyperbolic model $X$ on which $G$ acts acylindrically and non-elementarily. It proves that Morse geodesics in $G$ are precisely the projections of quasigeodesics in $X$, giving Morse local-to-global for these groups and enabling a universal recognition framework for stable subgroups. For UPG monodromy and its polynomial growth, the authors construct a quasitree model and derive acylindrical actions, leading to a detailed analysis of stability, strong quasiconvexity, and the Morse boundary. The results unify several aspects of non-positive curvature obstructions in free-by-cyclic groups and provide a robust toolkit for understanding their quasiconvex subgroups and Morse boundaries, with implications for hierarchical structures and relative hyperbolicity.

Abstract

We show that every finitely generated free-by-cyclic group $G$ admits a largest acylindrical action on a hyperbolic space $X$ obtained by coning off maximal product subgroups of $G$. We characterise Morse geodesics of $G$ as those that project to quasigeodesics in $X$, thus showing that all finitely generated free-by-cyclic groups are Morse local-to-global. We also characterise the stable and strongly quasiconvex subgroups of $G$. Finally, we compute the Morse boundary for \{finitely generated free\}-by-cyclic groups with unipotent and polynomially growing monodromy.

Largest acylindrical actions of free-by-cyclic groups

TL;DR

The paper establishes a canonical largest acylindrical action for finitely generated free-by-cyclic groups by coning off maximal product subgroups, yielding a hyperbolic model on which acts acylindrically and non-elementarily. It proves that Morse geodesics in are precisely the projections of quasigeodesics in , giving Morse local-to-global for these groups and enabling a universal recognition framework for stable subgroups. For UPG monodromy and its polynomial growth, the authors construct a quasitree model and derive acylindrical actions, leading to a detailed analysis of stability, strong quasiconvexity, and the Morse boundary. The results unify several aspects of non-positive curvature obstructions in free-by-cyclic groups and provide a robust toolkit for understanding their quasiconvex subgroups and Morse boundaries, with implications for hierarchical structures and relative hyperbolicity.

Abstract

We show that every finitely generated free-by-cyclic group admits a largest acylindrical action on a hyperbolic space obtained by coning off maximal product subgroups of . We characterise Morse geodesics of as those that project to quasigeodesics in , thus showing that all finitely generated free-by-cyclic groups are Morse local-to-global. We also characterise the stable and strongly quasiconvex subgroups of . Finally, we compute the Morse boundary for \{finitely generated free\}-by-cyclic groups with unipotent and polynomially growing monodromy.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 29 theorems, 22 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $G$ be a free-by-cyclic group with a finite generating set $S$, and let $\mathcal{P}$ be the collection of maximal product subgroups. The Cayley graph $X = \mathrm{Cay}(G; S \cup \mathcal{P})$ is hyperbolic, and it is unbounded if $G$ is not virtually a product. The regular action of $G$ on $X$

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The construction of the path $p_{xy}$ in the proof of Proposition \ref{['prop:quasitree']}. The sequence of $X_{v_{i_j}}$ is in bold. Starting with $i_0=0$, we have $i_0^+=2$ because $v_2\in\bar{N}(v_0)$, and then $i_1=3$. Next $i_1^+=4$, and $i_2=6$ because $v_4\in\bar{N}(v_6)$. The subspace $\bar{X}_{v_{i_1}}$ is highlighted in purple. The points $x_1$ and $y_1$ are produced by projecting to it.

Theorems & Definitions (50)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Proposition 2.1: bestvinafeighnhandel:tits:1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 40 more