Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to $e^+e^-\to η_c/χ_{cJ}+γ$ at B factories

Cong Li, Wen-Long Sang, Hong-Fei Zhang

TL;DR

This work advances the QCD description of exclusive charmonium production in $e^+e^-$ annihilation by computing helicity amplitudes for $e^+e^-\to \eta_c+\gamma$ and $e^+e^-\to \chi_{cJ}+\gamma$ up to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^2)$ within NRQCD. The authors construct composite asymptotic expressions for the short-distance coefficients by solving differential equations around four expansion points in $r=\frac{4m_c^2}{s}$, ensuring accurate coverage of the full physical range $0\le r\le 1$ with sub-percentage errors in most regions. They extract analytic leading and next-to-leading logarithms as $r\to 0$ and use the results to predict unpolarized cross sections and angular distributions, finding small to moderate perturbative corrections depending on the channel and substantial corrections for $\eta_c+\gamma$ and $\chi_{c2}+\gamma$. The theoretical predictions show good agreement with Belle data for $\chi_{c1}+\gamma$ within $2\sigma$, and the angular distribution parameters $\alpha^H_\theta$ are particularly stable and LDME‑independent, providing a clean test of NRQCD factorization at Belle II.

Abstract

We investigate the processes $e^+e^-\to η_c+γ$ and $e^+e^-\to χ_{cJ}+γ$ at B factories within the NRQCD factorization framework, computing the corresponding helicity amplitudes through $\mathcal{O}(α_s^2)$. The short-distance coefficients are obtained as series expansions in $r=\frac{4m_c^2}{s}$ around $r=0, 1/3, 2/3, 1$, using the method of differential equations. By combining the expansions from all four points, we construct composite asymptotic expressions that reproduce the exact results accurately over the full range $0 \leq r\leq 1$, with relative errors below $0.1\%$ over most of the domain and remaining under $1\%$ elsewhere. Analytic expressions for the leading and next-to-leading logarithmic terms are extracted in the limit $r\to 0$. Using these results, we compute the unpolarized cross sections and observe that the perturbative corrections are small for $χ_{c0}+γ$, moderate for $χ_{c1}+γ$, and substantial for $η_c+γ$ and $χ_{c2}+γ$. Theoretical prediction for $χ_{c1}+γ$ is consistent with the {\tt Belle} measurement within $2σ$, showing good agreement between theory and experiment. We also predict the angular distribution parameters $α^H_θ$, which are insensitive to NRQCD matrix elements and exhibit small theoretical uncertainties. These parameters further display good stability across different perturbative orders. With the high luminosity anticipated at {\tt Belle 2}, future experimental measurements will thus provide a clear test of NRQCD factorization.

The next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to $e^+e^-\to η_c/χ_{cJ}+γ$ at B factories

TL;DR

This work advances the QCD description of exclusive charmonium production in annihilation by computing helicity amplitudes for and up to within NRQCD. The authors construct composite asymptotic expressions for the short-distance coefficients by solving differential equations around four expansion points in , ensuring accurate coverage of the full physical range with sub-percentage errors in most regions. They extract analytic leading and next-to-leading logarithms as and use the results to predict unpolarized cross sections and angular distributions, finding small to moderate perturbative corrections depending on the channel and substantial corrections for and . The theoretical predictions show good agreement with Belle data for within , and the angular distribution parameters are particularly stable and LDME‑independent, providing a clean test of NRQCD factorization at Belle II.

Abstract

We investigate the processes and at B factories within the NRQCD factorization framework, computing the corresponding helicity amplitudes through . The short-distance coefficients are obtained as series expansions in around , using the method of differential equations. By combining the expansions from all four points, we construct composite asymptotic expressions that reproduce the exact results accurately over the full range , with relative errors below over most of the domain and remaining under elsewhere. Analytic expressions for the leading and next-to-leading logarithmic terms are extracted in the limit . Using these results, we compute the unpolarized cross sections and observe that the perturbative corrections are small for , moderate for , and substantial for and . Theoretical prediction for is consistent with the {\tt Belle} measurement within , showing good agreement between theory and experiment. We also predict the angular distribution parameters , which are insensitive to NRQCD matrix elements and exhibit small theoretical uncertainties. These parameters further display good stability across different perturbative orders. With the high luminosity anticipated at {\tt Belle 2}, future experimental measurements will thus provide a clear test of NRQCD factorization.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 44 equations, 7 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Representative Feynman diagrams for the process $\gamma^* \to c\bar{c}+\gamma$ at various perturbative orders. (a) LO diagram; (b)–(c) NLO diagrams; (d)–(h) NNLO diagrams, where (h) corresponds to the light-by-light contribution. All diagrams were drawn using JaxoDrawBinosi:2008ig.
  • Figure 2: Comparison between the asymptotic expansions around $r=0$ and the exact results for the real parts of the NLO coefficients $c^{H,(1)}_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}$.
  • Figure 3: Comparison between the asymptotic expansions around $r=0$ and the exact results for the imaginary parts of the NLO coefficients $c^{H,(1)}_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}$.
  • Figure 4: Comparison between the asymptotic expansions around $r=0$ and the exact results for the real parts of the NNLO coefficients $c^{H,(2)}_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}$.
  • Figure 5: Comparison between the asymptotic expansions around $r=0$ and the exact results for the imaginary parts of the NNLO coefficients $c^{H,(2)}_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}$.
  • ...and 2 more figures