Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Intuitionistic modal logic LIK4 is decidable

Philippe Balbiani, Çigdem Gencer, Tinko Tinchev

TL;DR

The paper proves the decidability of LIK4, an intuitionistic modal logic, by developing a constructive, labelled-tree based framework. It builds a canonical model, introduces a defect-repair saturation process, and demonstrates a finite frame property via regular clips and finite saturation, culminating in a finite-frame completeness result. This yields a practical decision procedure and provides structural insights into semantics and proof theory for intuitionistic modal logics. The approach also situates LIK4 within the landscape of finite-frame techniques, enabling standard decidability arguments.

Abstract

In this note, we prove that intuitionistic modal logic LIK4 is decidable.

Intuitionistic modal logic LIK4 is decidable

TL;DR

The paper proves the decidability of LIK4, an intuitionistic modal logic, by developing a constructive, labelled-tree based framework. It builds a canonical model, introduces a defect-repair saturation process, and demonstrates a finite frame property via regular clips and finite saturation, culminating in a finite-frame completeness result. This yields a practical decision procedure and provides structural insights into semantics and proof theory for intuitionistic modal logics. The approach also situates LIK4 within the landscape of finite-frame techniques, enabling standard decidability arguments.

Abstract

In this note, we prove that intuitionistic modal logic LIK4 is decidable.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 44 theorems, 1 equation.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $(N,{E},\lambda)$ be a $P$-labelled tree and $(i,j)$ be a duplicate in $(N,{E},$$\lambda)$. The structure $(N^{\prime},{E^{\prime}},\lambda^{\prime})$ such that is a $P$-labelled tree.

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Lemma 1
  • Lemma 2
  • Lemma 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Lemma 5
  • Lemma 6
  • Lemma 7
  • Lemma 8
  • Lemma 9
  • Lemma 10
  • ...and 34 more