Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Covering Relations in the Poset of Combinatorial Neural Codes

R. Amzi Jeffs, Trong-Thuc Trang

TL;DR

The paper investigates the poset P_Code of combinatorial neural codes under surjective morphisms, focusing on how codes cover one another. It provides a complete, constructive characterization of upward coverings by relating them to intersection-completions with isolated subsets and introduces four covering constructions. It also develops a refined treatment of downward coverings and analyzes intersection-complete codes, proving a core equivalence that coverings correspond to specific isolated-subset augmentations. These results bridge neural-code combinatorics with oriented-matroid representability, offering a concrete toolkit for understanding convex realizability and the structure of code minors.

Abstract

A combinatorial neural code is a subset of the power set $2^{[n]}$ on $[n]=\{1,\dots, n\}$, in which each $1\leq i\leq n$ represents a neuron and each element (codeword) represents the co-firing event of some neurons. Consider a space $X\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d$, simulating an animal's environment, and a collection $\mathcal{U}=\{U_1,\dots,U_n\}$ of open subsets of $X$. Each $U_i\subseteq X$ simulates a place field which is a specific region where a place cell $i$ is active. Then, the code of $\mathcal{U}$ in $X$ is defined as $\text{code}(\mathcal{U},X)=\left\{σ\subseteq[n]\bigg|\bigcap_{i\inσ} U_i\setminus\bigcup_{j\notinσ}U_j\neq\varnothing\right\}$. If a neural code $\mathcal{C}=\text{code}(\mathcal{U},X)$ for some $X$ and $\mathcal{U}$, we say $\mathcal{C}$ has a realization of open subsets of some space $X$. Although every combinatorial neural code obviously has a realization by some open subsets, determining whether it has a realization by some open convex subsets remains unsolved. Many studies attempted to tackle this decision problem, but only partial results were achieved. In fact, a previous study showed that the decision problem of convex neural codes is NP-hard. Furthermore, the authors of this study conjectured that every convex neural code can be realized as a minor of a neural code arising from a representable oriented matroid, which can lead to an equivalence between convex and polytope convex neural codes. Even though this conjecture has been confirmed in dimension two, its validity in higher dimensions is still unknown. To advance the investigation of this conjecture, we provide a complete characterization of the covering relations within the poset $\mathbf{P_{Code}}$ of neural codes.

Covering Relations in the Poset of Combinatorial Neural Codes

TL;DR

The paper investigates the poset P_Code of combinatorial neural codes under surjective morphisms, focusing on how codes cover one another. It provides a complete, constructive characterization of upward coverings by relating them to intersection-completions with isolated subsets and introduces four covering constructions. It also develops a refined treatment of downward coverings and analyzes intersection-complete codes, proving a core equivalence that coverings correspond to specific isolated-subset augmentations. These results bridge neural-code combinatorics with oriented-matroid representability, offering a concrete toolkit for understanding convex realizability and the structure of code minors.

Abstract

A combinatorial neural code is a subset of the power set on , in which each represents a neuron and each element (codeword) represents the co-firing event of some neurons. Consider a space , simulating an animal's environment, and a collection of open subsets of . Each simulates a place field which is a specific region where a place cell is active. Then, the code of in is defined as . If a neural code for some and , we say has a realization of open subsets of some space . Although every combinatorial neural code obviously has a realization by some open subsets, determining whether it has a realization by some open convex subsets remains unsolved. Many studies attempted to tackle this decision problem, but only partial results were achieved. In fact, a previous study showed that the decision problem of convex neural codes is NP-hard. Furthermore, the authors of this study conjectured that every convex neural code can be realized as a minor of a neural code arising from a representable oriented matroid, which can lead to an equivalence between convex and polytope convex neural codes. Even though this conjecture has been confirmed in dimension two, its validity in higher dimensions is still unknown. To advance the investigation of this conjecture, we provide a complete characterization of the covering relations within the poset of neural codes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 25 theorems, 9 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

proposition 1

If $f$ is a morphism of neural codes, then $f(\emptyset)=\emptyset$.

Theorems & Definitions (63)

  • definition 1: Codes of covers
  • definition 2: Combinatorial neural codes
  • definition 3: Trunks in neural codes
  • definition 4: Simple trunks and proper trunks
  • definition 5: Morphisms of neural codes
  • proposition 1
  • proof
  • definition 6
  • proposition 2
  • proof
  • ...and 53 more