Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$δ$-lifting and $1$-dimensional analytic fields

Jiahong Yu

TL;DR

The work determines when the valuation ring of a one-dimensional analytic field over a complete non-Archimedean base admits a flat $\delta$-lifting over $A_{\inf}$, tying liftability to the Abhyankar (not type $4$) condition. It establishes that, in characteristic $p$, this liftability is equivalent to $F$-splitting and that type $2$ points correspond to $F$-finite $\mathcal{K}^+/p$ (and finite Frobenius). The paper develops a rubric linking prismatization, de Rham–Frobenius theory, and Berkovich geometry, using Temkin's uniformization and deformation theory to extend the liftability criteria to mixed characteristic. A key correction to prior results on $F$-finiteness is provided via explicit counterexamples, and the results have implications for prismatization of geometric valuation rings in $p$-adic Hodge theory.

Abstract

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed complete non-Archimedean field, and let $K$ be a finitely generated field extension over $k$ with transcendence degree $1$. Equip $K$ a non-Archimedean norm extending the one on $k$, and let $\mathcal{K}$ denote the completion of $K$. We will prove that the valuation ring $\mathcal{K}^+$ admits a flat $δ$-lifting over $\mathbb{A}_{\mathrm{inf}}(k^+)$ if and only if $\mathcal{K}$ is not of type 4.

$δ$-lifting and $1$-dimensional analytic fields

TL;DR

The work determines when the valuation ring of a one-dimensional analytic field over a complete non-Archimedean base admits a flat -lifting over , tying liftability to the Abhyankar (not type ) condition. It establishes that, in characteristic , this liftability is equivalent to -splitting and that type points correspond to -finite (and finite Frobenius). The paper develops a rubric linking prismatization, de Rham–Frobenius theory, and Berkovich geometry, using Temkin's uniformization and deformation theory to extend the liftability criteria to mixed characteristic. A key correction to prior results on -finiteness is provided via explicit counterexamples, and the results have implications for prismatization of geometric valuation rings in -adic Hodge theory.

Abstract

Let be an algebraically closed complete non-Archimedean field, and let be a finitely generated field extension over with transcendence degree . Equip a non-Archimedean norm extending the one on , and let denote the completion of . We will prove that the valuation ring admits a flat -lifting over if and only if is not of type 4.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 32 theorems, 59 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.5

With the notation as above, the following are equivalent: If in addition $\mathrm{char}(k)=p$, the above conditions are further equivalent to $\mathcal{K}^+$ being $F$-split.

Theorems & Definitions (79)

  • Definition 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5: Subsection \ref{['pr to main 1']}
  • Theorem 1.6: Subsection \ref{['pf to main 2']}
  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.3
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.4
  • ...and 69 more