Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Direct Equivalence between Dynamics of Quantum Walks and Coupled Classical Oscillators

Lilith Zschetzsche, Refik Mansuroglu, András Molnár, Norbert Schuch

TL;DR

The paper establishes a direct, efficient correspondence between continuous-time quantum walks on exponentially large, sparse graphs and dynamics of classical harmonic oscillators on related graphs. It develops a sign-split embedding to transform sign patterns and constructs two reciprocal reductions: (i) quantum walks to harmonic oscillators by embedding into a doubled system and choosing a suitable $\gamma$, and (ii) harmonic oscillators to quantum walks by representing $A$ as $B^\dagger B$ and embedding to yield a quantum-walk evolution. The mappings preserve the underlying graph geometry, initialization, and read-out, are compatible with oracle access, and apply to both complete and restricted subclasses, providing new perspectives on BQP-hardness and enabling direct translation of algorithms between these paradigms. The framework yields an explicit relationship between output distributions via a sparse transition matrix $C$, supports efficient read-out from oscillator energies, and demonstrates a robust, general methodology for converting problems across quantum and classical-analog paradigms with broad applicability in quantum simulation and complexity.

Abstract

Continuous time quantum walks on exponentially large, sparse graphs form a powerful paradigm for quantum computing: On the one hand, they can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer. On the other hand, they are themselves BQP-complete, providing an alternative framework for thinking about quantum computing -- a perspective which has indeed led to a number of novel algorithms and oracle problems. Recently, simulating the dynamics of a system of harmonic oscillators (that is, masses and springs) was set forth as another BQP-complete problem defined on exponentially large, sparse graphs. In this work, we establish a direct and transparent mapping between these two classes of problems. As compared to linking the two classes of problems via their BQP-completeness, our mapping has several desirable features: It is transparent, in that it respects the structure of the problem, including the geometry of the underlying graph, initialization, read-out, and efficient oracle access, resulting in low overhead in terms of both space and time; it allows to map also between restricted subsets of instances of both problems which are not BQP-complete; it provides a recipe to directly translate any quantum algorithm designed in the quantum walk paradigm to harmonic oscillators (and vice versa); and finally, it provides an alternative, transparent way to prove BQP-completeness of the harmonic oscillator problem by mapping it to BQP-completeness construction for the quantum walk problem (or vice versa).

Direct Equivalence between Dynamics of Quantum Walks and Coupled Classical Oscillators

TL;DR

The paper establishes a direct, efficient correspondence between continuous-time quantum walks on exponentially large, sparse graphs and dynamics of classical harmonic oscillators on related graphs. It develops a sign-split embedding to transform sign patterns and constructs two reciprocal reductions: (i) quantum walks to harmonic oscillators by embedding into a doubled system and choosing a suitable , and (ii) harmonic oscillators to quantum walks by representing as and embedding to yield a quantum-walk evolution. The mappings preserve the underlying graph geometry, initialization, and read-out, are compatible with oracle access, and apply to both complete and restricted subclasses, providing new perspectives on BQP-hardness and enabling direct translation of algorithms between these paradigms. The framework yields an explicit relationship between output distributions via a sparse transition matrix , supports efficient read-out from oscillator energies, and demonstrates a robust, general methodology for converting problems across quantum and classical-analog paradigms with broad applicability in quantum simulation and complexity.

Abstract

Continuous time quantum walks on exponentially large, sparse graphs form a powerful paradigm for quantum computing: On the one hand, they can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer. On the other hand, they are themselves BQP-complete, providing an alternative framework for thinking about quantum computing -- a perspective which has indeed led to a number of novel algorithms and oracle problems. Recently, simulating the dynamics of a system of harmonic oscillators (that is, masses and springs) was set forth as another BQP-complete problem defined on exponentially large, sparse graphs. In this work, we establish a direct and transparent mapping between these two classes of problems. As compared to linking the two classes of problems via their BQP-completeness, our mapping has several desirable features: It is transparent, in that it respects the structure of the problem, including the geometry of the underlying graph, initialization, read-out, and efficient oracle access, resulting in low overhead in terms of both space and time; it allows to map also between restricted subsets of instances of both problems which are not BQP-complete; it provides a recipe to directly translate any quantum algorithm designed in the quantum walk paradigm to harmonic oscillators (and vice versa); and finally, it provides an alternative, transparent way to prove BQP-completeness of the harmonic oscillator problem by mapping it to BQP-completeness construction for the quantum walk problem (or vice versa).

Paper Structure

This paper contains 32 sections, 58 equations, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Left: Graph corresponding to $T_1$; Middle: System of unit masses and springs corresponding to $\tilde{A}_1=T_1^2$ with $\kappa_{11}=\kappa_{22}=\kappa_{33}=2$ and $\kappa_{13}=-1$, Right: System of unit masses and springs corresponding to $A_1$ with $\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_1(2)}=2$ and $\kappa_{\sigma_1(1)\sigma_2(3)}=1$.
  • Figure 2: Left: Graph corresponding to $T_2$. Right: Doubling leads to negative spring couplings to the wall: $\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_1(2)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(3)\sigma_1(3)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(4)\sigma_1(4)}=-1$, $\kappa_{\sigma_1(1)\sigma_1(1)}=3$, $\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_2(3)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_2(4)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(3)\sigma_2(4)}=1$.
  • Figure 3: Left: Graph $T_3$ constructed from $T_2$ by adding a weighted self-loop to every node. Right: For the doubled spring system we get $\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_2(3)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_2(4)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(3)\sigma_2(4)}=1$, $\kappa_{\sigma_1(1)\sigma_1(1)}=3$, $\kappa_{\sigma_1(1)\sigma_2(2)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(1)\sigma_2(3)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(1)\sigma_2(4)}=12$, and $\kappa_{\sigma_1(2)\sigma_1(2)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(3)\sigma_1(3)}=\kappa_{\sigma_1(4)\sigma_1(4)}=23$.

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Example 3
  • Example 4