Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New high-statistics measurement of the $π^0 \to e^+e^-γ$ Dalitz decay at the Mainz Microtron

S. Prakhov, L. Heijkenskjöld, S. Abt, P. Achenbach, P. Adlarson, F. Afzal, Z. Ahmed, K. Altangerel, J. R. M. Annand, M. Bashkanov, R. Beck, M. Biroth, N. S. Borisov, A. Braghieri, W. J. Briscoe, F. Cividini, C. Collicott, S. Costanza, A. Denig, M. Dieterle, A. S. Dolzhikov, E. J. Downie, P. Drexler, S. Fegan, S. Gardner, D. Ghosal, D. I. Glazier, I. Gorodnov, W. Gradl, M. Günther, G. M. Gurevich, D. Hornidge, G. M. Huber, A. Käser, V. L. Kashevarov, S. J. D. Kay, M. Korolija, B. Krusche, A. Lazarev, K. Livingston, S. Lutterer, I. J. D. MacGregor, D. M. Manley, P. P. Martel, R. Miskimen, M. Mocanu, E. Mornacchi, C. Mullen, A. Neganov, A. Neiser, M. Ostrick, P. B. Otte, D. Paudyal, P. Pedroni, A. Powell, E. Rickert, T. Rostomyan, V. Sokhoyan, K. Spieker, O. Steffen, I. I. Strakovsky, Th. Strub, I. Supek, M. Thiel, A. Thomas, Yu. A. Usov, S. Wagner, D. P. Watts, D. Werthmüller, J. Wettig, M. Wolfes, N. Zachariou

TL;DR

The paper addresses the time-like electromagnetic transition form factor of the π^0 through the Dalitz decay $\pi^0\to e^+e^-\gamma$, a key input for hadronic light-by-light contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment $(g-2)_\mu$. Using the A2 setup at MAMI, the authors analyze $\gamma p\to \pi^0 p\to e^+e^-\gamma p$ with ~3.31×10^9 produced $\pi^0$ mesons, yielding about $2.4\times10^6$ Dalitz decays and extracting the slope parameter $a_\pi=0.0315\pm0.0026_{\mathrm{stat}}\pm0.0010_{\mathrm{syst}}$. They present $|F_{\pi^0\gamma}(m_{ee})|^2$ in 22 bins over $m_{ee}$ from 15 to 125 MeV/$c^2$, and compare to previous measurements and theoretical models (Padé and dispersive analyses), finding overall agreement and improved precision. The results help constrain low-energy QCD and HLbL inputs, though the uncertainties remain too large to significantly refine $(g-2)_\mu$ beyond current data-driven estimates. The work provides a high-statistics benchmark for time-like TFFs and furnishes data for model-independent fits and future analyses.

Abstract

The Dalitz decay $π^0 \to e^+e^-γ$ has been measured with the highest statistical accuracy obtained so far in the $γp\to π^0 p$ reaction with the A2 tagged-photon facility at the Mainz Microtron, MAMI. The value of the slope parameter for the $π^0$ electromagnetic transition form factor, $a_π=0.0315\pm 0.0026_{\mathrm{stat}}\pm 0.0010_{\mathrm{syst}}$, is obtained from the analysis of $2.4\times10^6$ $π^0 \to e^+e^-γ$ observed decays. Within experimental uncertainties, it is in agreement with existing measurements and theoretical calculations, with its own uncertainty being smaller than previous results based on the analysis of $π^0\to e^+e^-γ$ decays.

New high-statistics measurement of the $π^0 \to e^+e^-γ$ Dalitz decay at the Mainz Microtron

TL;DR

The paper addresses the time-like electromagnetic transition form factor of the π^0 through the Dalitz decay , a key input for hadronic light-by-light contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment . Using the A2 setup at MAMI, the authors analyze with ~3.31×10^9 produced mesons, yielding about Dalitz decays and extracting the slope parameter . They present in 22 bins over from 15 to 125 MeV/, and compare to previous measurements and theoretical models (Padé and dispersive analyses), finding overall agreement and improved precision. The results help constrain low-energy QCD and HLbL inputs, though the uncertainties remain too large to significantly refine beyond current data-driven estimates. The work provides a high-statistics benchmark for time-like TFFs and furnishes data for model-independent fits and future analyses.

Abstract

The Dalitz decay has been measured with the highest statistical accuracy obtained so far in the reaction with the A2 tagged-photon facility at the Mainz Microtron, MAMI. The value of the slope parameter for the electromagnetic transition form factor, , is obtained from the analysis of observed decays. Within experimental uncertainties, it is in agreement with existing measurements and theoretical calculations, with its own uncertainty being smaller than previous results based on the analysis of decays.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 6 equations, 9 figures, 1 table.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: (Color online) Experimental events selected as $\gamma p\to e^+e^-\gamma p$ candidates by requiring the kinematic-fit CL($\gamma p\to 3\gamma p$)$>$1% and $e^{\pm}$ to be identified by using $dE/dx$ from the PID to suppress their misidentification with recoiling protons: (a) the two-dimensional distribution of $m(e^+e^-\gamma)$ vs $m(e^+e^-)$; (b) the $m(e^+e^-\gamma)$ distribution fitted with the sum of a Gaussian for the $\pi^0 \to e^+e^-\gamma$ peak (blue line) and a polynomial of order 4 for the background (green line), and the subtracted empty-target background shown by the magenta line.
  • Figure 2: (Color online) $m(e^+e^-\gamma)$ invariant-mass distributions obtained in the range $40<m(e^+e^-)<45$ MeV/$c^2$ with $\gamma p\to e^+e^-\gamma p$ candidates selected without using a $dE/dx$ PID cut to separate $e^{\pm}$ from the recoil protons: (a) MC simulation of $6.2\times10^9$$\gamma p\to \pi^0 p \to \gamma\gamma p$ events; (b) MC simulation of $1.6\times10^8$$\gamma p\to \pi^0 p \to e^+e^-\gamma p$ events; (c) experimental spectrum (solid triangles with error bars) fitted with the sum of the $\gamma p\to \pi^0 p \to e^+e^-\gamma p$ and $\gamma p\to \pi^0 p \to \gamma\gamma p$ MC simulations (shown by the blue line), with the fraction of the $\gamma p\to \pi^0 p \to \gamma\gamma p$ background shown by the red line.
  • Figure 3: (Color online) Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:pi0eeg_2018_mee40_45mev_hfit_3x1']}, but with the use of a $dE/dx$ PID cut to separate $e^{\pm}$ from the recoil protons.
  • Figure 4: (Color online) Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:pi0eeg_2018_mee40_45mev_hfit_3x1']}, but for the invariant-mass range $100<m(e^+e^-)<105$ MeV/$c^2$.
  • Figure 5: (Color online) Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:pi0eeg_2018_mee100_105mev_hfit_3x1']}, but with using a $dE/dx$ PID cut to separate $e^{\pm}$ from the recoil protons.
  • ...and 4 more figures