Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Increasing the Size of Tame Shafarevich Groups

Andreea Iorga, Ravi Ramakrishna

TL;DR

The paper extends tame duality for Shafarevich groups by proving that, for a tame set $S$ and a finite $\mathbb{F}_p[G_K]$-module $A$, one can choose infinitely many tame sets $X$ so that $Sha^2$ over the enlarged set embeds into the corresponding $\ RusB$-group and, after passing to the field $L=K(A)$ and taking $\Gamma$-invariants, these groups align with the original $\ RusB$-group. The construction relies on translating between $Sha^2_S(K,A)$ and $\ RusB_S(K,A)$ via inflation-restriction, Chebotarev arguments, and descent along $L/K$ under the condition $(|\Gamma|,p)=1$, with $p=2$ treated separately. The results generalize previous work by handling arbitrary finite $\mathbb{F}_p[G_{K,S}]$-modules in the tame setting and by exhibiting infinite families of tame enlargements that preserve and reveal duality relations. Concrete examples illustrate how enlarging $S$ can maximize $Sha^2$ or realize stable isomorphisms with $\ RusB$, demonstrating the practical reach of the tame duality framework.

Abstract

Let $K$ be a number field with a finite set $S$ of primes. We study the cohomology of $\mathbb{F}_p[G_{K,S}]$-modules $A$, in particular the Shafarevich groups $\Sha^i_S(K,A)$ for $i=1,2$ for tame sets $S$, i.e., for sets $S$ that contain no primes above $p$. When $S$ contains all primes above $p$ (the ``wild'' setting), it is a consequence of global Poitou-Tate duality that $\Sha^1_S(K,A')^\vee \simeq \Sha^2_S(K,A) \stackrel{\simeq}{\hookrightarrow} \RusB_S(K,A) $ is non-increasing as $S$ increases. The same applies when $G_{K,S}$ is replaced by its maximal pro-$p$ quotient $G_{K,S}(p)$. In [4] it was shown that for $S$ tame and $A=\mathbb{F}_p$ with trivial action, the group $\Sha^2_S(K, A)$ can increase as $S$ increases to $S\cup X$, and even attain its maximal dimension, $\dim_{\mathbb{F}_p} \RusB_S(K,\mathbb{F}_p)$, for carefully chosen $X$. We strengthen this to general $\mathbb{F}_p[G_{K,S}]$-modules $A$ where $S$ is tame. We use Liu's definition [7] of $\RusB_S(K,A)$ to show that $\Sha^2_S(K,A) \hookrightarrow \RusB_S(K,A)$ and that there exist infinitely many tame sets of primes $X$ of $K$ such that $\Sha^2_{S\cup X}(K,A) \stackrel{\simeq}{\hookrightarrow} \RusB_{S \cup X}(K,A) \stackrel{\simeq}{\twoheadleftarrow} \RusB_S(K,A) \hookleftarrow \Sha^2_S(K,A)$.

Increasing the Size of Tame Shafarevich Groups

TL;DR

The paper extends tame duality for Shafarevich groups by proving that, for a tame set and a finite -module , one can choose infinitely many tame sets so that over the enlarged set embeds into the corresponding -group and, after passing to the field and taking -invariants, these groups align with the original -group. The construction relies on translating between and via inflation-restriction, Chebotarev arguments, and descent along under the condition , with treated separately. The results generalize previous work by handling arbitrary finite -modules in the tame setting and by exhibiting infinite families of tame enlargements that preserve and reveal duality relations. Concrete examples illustrate how enlarging can maximize or realize stable isomorphisms with , demonstrating the practical reach of the tame duality framework.

Abstract

Let be a number field with a finite set of primes. We study the cohomology of -modules , in particular the Shafarevich groups for for tame sets , i.e., for sets that contain no primes above . When contains all primes above (the ``wild'' setting), it is a consequence of global Poitou-Tate duality that is non-increasing as increases. The same applies when is replaced by its maximal pro- quotient . In [4] it was shown that for tame and with trivial action, the group can increase as increases to , and even attain its maximal dimension, , for carefully chosen . We strengthen this to general -modules where is tame. We use Liu's definition [7] of to show that and that there exist infinitely many tame sets of primes of such that .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 13 theorems, 45 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $A$ be any finite cardinality $G_{K,S}$-module.

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Theorem 1
  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Proposition 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Proposition 5
  • proof
  • Corollary 6
  • ...and 21 more