Qudits offer no advantages over dits for sending random messages
Ronit Shah
TL;DR
The paper analyzes a one-shot messenger–receiver task where Alice sends one quantum system of dimension d to Bob, seeking to maximize the probability Bob correctly identifies the message drawn from a known prior. It proves that, in the absence of preshared entanglement, a qudit offers no advantage over a classical d-ary symbol: the maximum success probability is bounded by the sum of the top-d priors, and pure encodings suffice. It further derives a mixed-state spectral bound, P_succ^{qu} ≤ ∑_{k=1}^{d} λ'_{(k)}, where λ'_{ik} = p_i λ_{ik} are the weighted eigenvalues, and proves sharpness for both bounds. The results strengthen the standard dimension-based ceiling and connect the classical and quantum limits through a unified, spectrum-aware framework, with implications for understanding information transmission without entanglement and for minimum-error discrimination strategies.
Abstract
We consider the following simple scenario: Alice has one of many possible messages, drawn from a known distribution, and wants to maximize the probability that Bob guesses her message correctly. We prove that if Alice can send only a qudit to Bob, without preshared entanglement, there is never any advantage over sending him a classical dit. This result was previously known only for a uniform distribution. We also prove a mixed-state generalization of this result in the form of an upper bound on the success probability of discriminating between mixed quantum states with a single measurement. This bound is based solely on the dimension, probability distribution, and eigenvalues of the states and is sharp among such bounds.
