Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Teichmüller spaces and normal forms associated to wandering domains

Núria Fagella, Gustavo R. Ferreira, Leticia Pardo-Simón

TL;DR

This work analyzes the dynamical Teichmüller space associated to wandering domains of transcendental entire functions, establishing a sharp dichotomy: the associated Teichmüller space is infinite-dimensional precisely when the grand orbit relation is discrete. It develops a robust normal-form theory for internal wandering-domain dynamics, yielding global non-autonomous linearising coordinates in the discrete case and revealing power-map dynamics on annuli or punctured discs in the indiscrete case. The authors prove that discrete grand-orbit components contribute infinite-dimensional Teichmüller factors, while indiscrete components yield finite-dimensional (often one-dimensional) or trivial factors, and they characterize when the wandering-domain Teichmüller space is finite-dimensional. The methods combine geometric convergence of marked surfaces and deck groups, inner-function dynamics from Riemann maps, hyperbolic-geometric tools, and non-autonomous conjugacies, providing a comprehensive picture that answers longstanding questions about wandering domains and their moduli spaces.

Abstract

We study the dynamical Teichmüller space ${\mathcal T}(U,f)$ associated to a wandering domain $U$ of an entire function $f$. We show that a discrete grand orbit relation in $U$ forces ${\mathcal T}(U,f)$ to be infinite dimensional, thereby answering a question of Fagella--Henriksen. We further describe the geometry of these spaces by developing normal forms for the dynamics on wandering domains, yielding global linearising coordinates in the discrete case and power-type dynamics between annuli in the indiscrete case.

Teichmüller spaces and normal forms associated to wandering domains

TL;DR

This work analyzes the dynamical Teichmüller space associated to wandering domains of transcendental entire functions, establishing a sharp dichotomy: the associated Teichmüller space is infinite-dimensional precisely when the grand orbit relation is discrete. It develops a robust normal-form theory for internal wandering-domain dynamics, yielding global non-autonomous linearising coordinates in the discrete case and revealing power-map dynamics on annuli or punctured discs in the indiscrete case. The authors prove that discrete grand-orbit components contribute infinite-dimensional Teichmüller factors, while indiscrete components yield finite-dimensional (often one-dimensional) or trivial factors, and they characterize when the wandering-domain Teichmüller space is finite-dimensional. The methods combine geometric convergence of marked surfaces and deck groups, inner-function dynamics from Riemann maps, hyperbolic-geometric tools, and non-autonomous conjugacies, providing a comprehensive picture that answers longstanding questions about wandering domains and their moduli spaces.

Abstract

We study the dynamical Teichmüller space associated to a wandering domain of an entire function . We show that a discrete grand orbit relation in forces to be infinite dimensional, thereby answering a question of Fagella--Henriksen. We further describe the geometry of these spaces by developing normal forms for the dynamics on wandering domains, yielding global linearising coordinates in the discrete case and power-type dynamics between annuli in the indiscrete case.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 26 theorems, 62 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $f\colon {\mathbb{C}}\to{\mathbb{C}}$ be an entire function with a wandering domain $U$, let $V$ be a connected component of $\widehat{F}(f)\cap U$, and let $\widehat{V}$ denote the grand orbit of $V$. Then $\mathcal{T}(\widehat{V},f)$ is infinite-dimensional if and only if the grand orbit relat

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Theorem 1.1: Discreteness if and only if infinite-dimensional Teichmüller space
  • Remark
  • Theorem 1.2: Discrete orbit relation and linearising coordinates
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4: Indiscrete orbit relation and power maps
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Remark
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: FH09, MS98
  • Theorem 2.3: MS98, FH09
  • ...and 36 more