Generic rigidity and accidental modes in metal-organic frameworks
Christopher M. Owen, Michael J. Lawler
TL;DR
MOFs are prone to mechanical instability and soft guest-induced motions, complicating predictive design. The authors develop a rigidity-matrix framework based on a constraint network with bond-stretching and bond-bending springs parameterized by $UFF4MOF$, linking topology to dynamics via the Maxwell–Calladine index $ \nu \equiv N_0 - N_{\mathrm{ss}} = dN_s - N_c$. Through large-scale analysis of 5,682 CoRE MOFs, they find most structures are formally over-constrained yet cluster near the isostatic threshold, with many accidental zero modes that threaten stability; in UiO-66, adding long-range auxiliary constraints lifts these modes into soft finite-frequency bands. The approach enables rapid, interpretable mechanical screening and suggests a design principle of near-criticality and connections to topological mechanics in porous crystals.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) combine high porosity with structural fragility, raising important questions about their mechanical stability. We develop a rigidity-based framework in which spring networks parameterized by UFF4MOF are used to construct rigidity and dynamical matrices. Large-scale analysis of 5,682 MOFs from the CoRE 2019 database shows that most frameworks are formally over-constrained yet cluster sharply near the isostatic threshold, revealing accidental geometric modes and placing many MOFs near mechanical instability. In the representative case of UiO-66, we show that auxiliary long-range constraints introduced by tuning the neighbor cutoff lift these modes into soft, flat, finite-frequency bands. The results show that rigidity-matrix analysis can rapidly identify MOFs likely to remain mechanically stable. This near-criticality mirrors behavior known from topological mechanics and points to a deeper design principle in porous crystals.
