Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rotationally symmetric plabic graphs and the Lagrangian Grassmannian

Olha Shevchenko

TL;DR

The paper defines the totally nonnegative Lagrangian Grassmannian LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n), consisting of n-dimensional subspaces isotropic with respect to a skew-symmetric bilinear form R, and develops a symmetry-enforced combinatorial framework using rho-symmetric, non-reduced plabic graphs. It characterizes the cell decomposition indexed by rho-symmetric bounded affine permutations f in B^{R}(n,2n), proving each cell Pi^{>0,R}_{f} is homeomorphic to R^{d_{R}(f)} and that closure relations correspond to the symmetric affine Bruhat order f ⪯_{R} g; moreover, LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n) is a closed ball with dimension equal to {n+1 choose 2}. The work also provides a Plücker-minor description of LG^{R}(n,2n) via Delta_I(X) = Delta_{R(I)}(X) and relates LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n) to symmetric Persymmetric matrices, along with a thorough development of rho-symmetric graphs, bridges, lollipops, and fixed-point insertions to parametrize cells, including a detailed analysis of when rho-symmetric graphs can be reduced. Overall, the paper extends the Plücker-graph dictionary to the symmetric Lagrangian setting and establishes a robust combinatorial/topological picture for LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n).

Abstract

We introduce the totally nonnegative Lagrangian Grassmannian $\rm{LG}_{\geq 0}^R (n,2n)$, a new subset of the totally nonnegative Grassmannian consisting of subspaces isotropic with respect to a certain bilinear form $R$. We describe its cell structure and show that each cell admits a representation by a rotationally symmetric (not necessarily reduced) plabic graph. Along the way, we develop new techniques for working with non-reduced plabic graphs.

Rotationally symmetric plabic graphs and the Lagrangian Grassmannian

TL;DR

The paper defines the totally nonnegative Lagrangian Grassmannian LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n), consisting of n-dimensional subspaces isotropic with respect to a skew-symmetric bilinear form R, and develops a symmetry-enforced combinatorial framework using rho-symmetric, non-reduced plabic graphs. It characterizes the cell decomposition indexed by rho-symmetric bounded affine permutations f in B^{R}(n,2n), proving each cell Pi^{>0,R}_{f} is homeomorphic to R^{d_{R}(f)} and that closure relations correspond to the symmetric affine Bruhat order f ⪯_{R} g; moreover, LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n) is a closed ball with dimension equal to {n+1 choose 2}. The work also provides a Plücker-minor description of LG^{R}(n,2n) via Delta_I(X) = Delta_{R(I)}(X) and relates LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n) to symmetric Persymmetric matrices, along with a thorough development of rho-symmetric graphs, bridges, lollipops, and fixed-point insertions to parametrize cells, including a detailed analysis of when rho-symmetric graphs can be reduced. Overall, the paper extends the Plücker-graph dictionary to the symmetric Lagrangian setting and establishes a robust combinatorial/topological picture for LG^{R}_{ geq 0}(n,2n).

Abstract

We introduce the totally nonnegative Lagrangian Grassmannian , a new subset of the totally nonnegative Grassmannian consisting of subspaces isotropic with respect to a certain bilinear form . We describe its cell structure and show that each cell admits a representation by a rotationally symmetric (not necessarily reduced) plabic graph. Along the way, we develop new techniques for working with non-reduced plabic graphs.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 31 sections, 50 theorems, 148 equations, 11 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: The two networks represent the same point $X$. The one on the left is reduced, but not $\rho$-symmetric, while the one on the right is $\rho$-symmetric, but not reduced. Here, unmarked edges have weight $1$.
  • Figure 2: The $\rho$-symmetric graphs parametrizing the top cells for $n=2$ and $3$.
  • Figure 3: Some local moves for plabic graphs.
  • Figure 4: Strand permutation for a reduced plabic graph.
  • Figure 5: The process of adding a bridge between $i$ and $i+1$, white at $i$. We add a new edge on the first step and then adjust the colors to make sure the resulting graph is bipartite on the second step.
  • ...and 6 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (123)

  • Theorem 1.2
  • Example 1.3
  • Example 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5: postnikov, Theorem 17.8
  • Definition 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Theorem 2.8: postnikov, Theorem 4.8
  • ...and 113 more