Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Classical Cepheids in the Galactic thin disk. I. Abundance gradients through NLTE spectral analysis

Antonino Nunnari, Valentina D'Orazi, Giuliana Fiorentino, Vittorio F. Braga, Giuseppe Bono, Michele Fabrizio, Henrik Jönsson, Rolf-Peter Kudritzki, Ronaldo da Silva, Maria Bergemann, Eloisa Poggio, Jonah V. Otto, Karina Baeza-Villagra, Angela Bragaglia, Giulia Ceci, Massimo Dall'Ora, Laura Inno, Carmela Lardo, Noriyuki Matsunaga, Matteo Monelli, Manuel Sánchez-Benavente, Chris Sneden, Maria Tantalo, Frédéric Thévénin

TL;DR

This study delivers a homogeneous NLTE spectroscopic analysis of 401 Galactic Classical Cepheids, deriving atmospheric parameters and abundances for multiple elements across Galactocentric distances of 4.6–29.3 kpc. By comparing linear, logarithmic, bilinear, and non-parametric Gaussian Process Regression models, the authors show that iron and most elemental gradients are better described by non-linear forms, with a robust outer-disk flattening revealed by GPR. They also find that [X/Fe] is largely radius-independent, with modest Na and Al offsets and mild Mn and Cu declines, while NLTE effects are especially significant for O. The results tighten empirical constraints for Milky Way chemo-dynamical models and demonstrate the value of full NLTE treatment for mapping chemical gradients with future large spectroscopic surveys.

Abstract

Classical Cepheids (CCs) have long been considered excellent tracers of the chemical evolution of the Milky Way's young disk. We present a homogeneous, NLTE spectroscopic analysis of 401 Galactic CCs, based on 1,351 high-resolution optical spectra, spanning Galactocentric distances from 4.6 to 29.3 kpc. Using PySME with MARCS atmospheres and state-of-the-art grids of NLTE departure coefficients, we derive atmospheric parameters and abundances for key species tracing multiple nucleosynthetic channels. Our sample-the largest CC NLTE dataset to date-achieves high internal precision and enables robust modeling of present-day thin-disk abundance patterns and radial gradients. We estimate abundance gradients using three analytic prescriptions (linear, logarithmic, bilinear with a break) within a Bayesian, outlier-robust framework, and we also apply Gaussian Process Regression to capture non-parametric variations. We find that NLTE atmospheric parameters differ systematically from LTE determinations. Moreover, iron and most elemental abundance profiles are better described by non-linear behavior rather than by single-slope linear models: logarithmic fits generally outperform simple linear models, while bilinear fits yield inconsistent break radii across elements. Gaussian Process models reveal a consistent outer-disk flattening of [X/H] for nearly all studied elements. The [X/Fe] ratios are largely flat with Galactocentric radius, indicating coherent chemical scaling with iron across the thin disk, with modest positive offsets for Na and Al and mild declines for Mn and Cu. Comparison with recent literature shows overall agreement but highlights NLTE-driven differences, especially in outer-disk abundances. These results provide tighter empirical constraints for chemo-dynamical models of the Milky Way and set the stage for future NLTE mapping with upcoming large spectroscopic surveys.

Classical Cepheids in the Galactic thin disk. I. Abundance gradients through NLTE spectral analysis

TL;DR

This study delivers a homogeneous NLTE spectroscopic analysis of 401 Galactic Classical Cepheids, deriving atmospheric parameters and abundances for multiple elements across Galactocentric distances of 4.6–29.3 kpc. By comparing linear, logarithmic, bilinear, and non-parametric Gaussian Process Regression models, the authors show that iron and most elemental gradients are better described by non-linear forms, with a robust outer-disk flattening revealed by GPR. They also find that [X/Fe] is largely radius-independent, with modest Na and Al offsets and mild Mn and Cu declines, while NLTE effects are especially significant for O. The results tighten empirical constraints for Milky Way chemo-dynamical models and demonstrate the value of full NLTE treatment for mapping chemical gradients with future large spectroscopic surveys.

Abstract

Classical Cepheids (CCs) have long been considered excellent tracers of the chemical evolution of the Milky Way's young disk. We present a homogeneous, NLTE spectroscopic analysis of 401 Galactic CCs, based on 1,351 high-resolution optical spectra, spanning Galactocentric distances from 4.6 to 29.3 kpc. Using PySME with MARCS atmospheres and state-of-the-art grids of NLTE departure coefficients, we derive atmospheric parameters and abundances for key species tracing multiple nucleosynthetic channels. Our sample-the largest CC NLTE dataset to date-achieves high internal precision and enables robust modeling of present-day thin-disk abundance patterns and radial gradients. We estimate abundance gradients using three analytic prescriptions (linear, logarithmic, bilinear with a break) within a Bayesian, outlier-robust framework, and we also apply Gaussian Process Regression to capture non-parametric variations. We find that NLTE atmospheric parameters differ systematically from LTE determinations. Moreover, iron and most elemental abundance profiles are better described by non-linear behavior rather than by single-slope linear models: logarithmic fits generally outperform simple linear models, while bilinear fits yield inconsistent break radii across elements. Gaussian Process models reveal a consistent outer-disk flattening of [X/H] for nearly all studied elements. The [X/Fe] ratios are largely flat with Galactocentric radius, indicating coherent chemical scaling with iron across the thin disk, with modest positive offsets for Na and Al and mild declines for Mn and Cu. Comparison with recent literature shows overall agreement but highlights NLTE-driven differences, especially in outer-disk abundances. These results provide tighter empirical constraints for chemo-dynamical models of the Milky Way and set the stage for future NLTE mapping with upcoming large spectroscopic surveys.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 3 equations, 30 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (30)

  • Figure 1: Distribution of the sample of CCs across the thin disk in a Galactocentric reference frame. The face-on map of the Milky Way was made with the Python library mw-plot.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of atmospheric parameters derived under NLTE and LTE assumptions. Each panel displays the difference (NLTE – LTE) as a function of the corresponding parameter on the left, and the distribution of the difference on the right. A blue-dotted Gaussian fit is overplotted on each histogram, the mean and standard deviation are labelled in the top-right corner. The blue-dashed horizontal line shows the mean difference, while the gray solid line the null difference.
  • Figure 3: Panel a) -- Difference between the $\mathrm{T_{eff}}$ from current estimates and da2023oxygen, plotted as a function of the current $\mathrm{T_{eff}}$. Spectra from different datasets are marked with different colors. The error bars are plotted in the bottom left corner. The red line shows the linear fit and the coefficients are displayed on top of each panel. The mean and the standard deviation are also labeled. Panel b) -- Same as Panel a), but for the surface gravity. Panel c) -- Same as Panel a), but for the microturbulent velocity (km s$^{-1}$). Panel d) -- Same as Panel a), but for the iron abundance (dex).
  • Figure 4: Comparison of our metallicity with Trentin24B (top panel) and with luck18 (bottom panel).
  • Figure 5: Panel a) -- Iron radial gradient for classical Cepheids as a function of the Galactocentric distance. The linear, the logarithmic and the bilinear fits are shown respectively in blue, red and green. The vertical green dashed line shows the "knee" of the bilinear fit. The coefficients of the fits are labelled. Panel b) -- residuals of the linear fit. The values of the mean square error, the reduced chi-squared and the AIC score are labelled. Panel c) -- Same as panel b), but for the logarithmic fit. Panel d) -- Same as panel b), but for the bilinear fit.
  • ...and 25 more figures