Relativistic recoil as a key to the fine-structure puzzle in muonic $^{90}\text{Zr}$
Konstantin A. Beyer, Igor A. Valuev, Zoia A. Mandrykina, Zewen Sun, Natalia S. Oreshkina
TL;DR
The paper addresses the long-standing muonic fine-structure anomaly in muonic Zr-90 and Sn-120 by performing fully relativistic QED calculations with a finite-size nucleus and a rigorous treatment of the relativistic recoil. It fits ab initio QED corrections to precision muonic transition data using a two-parameter Fermi charge distribution, from which the rms radius is extracted. For Zr-90 the rms radius is $4.2732(7)$ fm, and for Sn-120 it is $4.6518(34)$ fm, with a good fit indicating the relativistic recoil resolves the anomaly. The results indicate underestimation of uncertainties in many published radii and highlight the need for higher transitions and more realistic charge distributions beyond the 2pF model in heavier nuclei. Overall, the work provides a rigorous QED-based resolution to the muonic fine-structure puzzle and establishes a robust muonic benchmark for nuclear radii and precision tests of QED.
Abstract
The long-standing fine-structure anomaly in muonic $^{90}$Zr is resolved through a rigorous treatment of the relativistic-recoil effect. From a fit of ab initio QED calculations of the muonic $^{90}$Zr spectrum to precision measurements performed four decades ago, we extract a significantly more precise root-mean-square (rms) charge radius with 6-fold improvement in quality of the fit. A 2-parameter Fermi (2pF) distribution is assumed to model the nuclear charge density and yields a best-fit value of rms charge radius of $r_\text{rms}[^{90}\text{Zr}]=4.2732(7)$ fm ($χ^2 /{\text{DoF}} = 0.995$), in agreement with the previous muonic spectroscopy value, but a factor $6$ more precise, and 3$σ$ larger than the accepted literature value. Additionally, the same analysis has been performed for $^{120}$Sn, where the extracted value of $r_\text{rms}[^{120}\text{Sn}]=4.6518(34)$ fm ($χ^2 /{\text{DoF}} = 0.88$) is consistent with the accepted value. These results confirm our assumption that the muonic fine-structure puzzle arose from an incomplete treatment of QED effects and their uncertainties.
