Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Evaluating the tame Brauer group of open varieties over local fields

Victor de Vries

TL;DR

The paper analyzes evaluation maps on the p-torsion and p'-torsion parts of the Brauer group for open varieties over local fields, where the complement is a divisor. It shows that Leray-spectral-sequence-based arguments are not in general sufficient to determine the evaluation maps, and develops a derived-category framework using localisation triangles, Gysin maps, and representable functors to articulate how $u^*$ is controlled by geometric data. The main result states that $u^*$ depends only on the cohomology class $\mathrm{cl}(Z\cap x)\in \mathrm{H}^{2d}_{|Z\cap x|}(Z,\mu_n^{\otimes d})$, effectively reducing the problem to local intersection data; the argument proceeds by comparing two localisation triangles and extracting the key component $\alpha$, which is shown to be determined by cycle-classes via base-change compatibility. The paper also discusses special cases (e.g. snc divisors with $\gcd(n,q-1)=1$) where the analysis simplifies, and highlights open questions about the sharpness of the conditions and possible extensions.

Abstract

In this document we let $U$ be a smooth variety of pure dimension $d$ over a local field $k_v$ with unit ball $\mathcal{O}_v$ and residue field $\mathbb{F}$ of characteristic $p>0$ and we set $n$ to be a positive integer such that $p\nmid n$. For various $u\in U(k_v)$ we study the evaluation map $u^*:\mathrm{H}^2(U,μ_n)\to \mathrm{H}^2(k_v,μ_n)$. We suppose that $U$ embeds as an open subscheme in a regular scheme $\mathcal{X}$ that is of finite type over $\mathcal{O}_v$. We assume that $Z:=\mathcal{X}\setminus U$ is a divisor and we endow it with its reduced scheme structure. We show that for $u_1,u_2\in U(k_v)$ that lift to $x_1,x_2\in \mathcal{X}(\mathcal{O}_v)$ we obtain the same evaluation map $u_1^*=u_2^*$ under the two conditions that first, there is an equality of reductions $\overline{x_1}=\overline{x_2}$ in $\mathcal{X}(\mathbb{F})$ and second, that $\mathrm{cl}(x_1\cap Z)=\mathrm{cl}(x_2\cap Z)$ holds in $\mathrm{H}^{2d}_{|\overline{x}|}(Z,μ_n^{\otimes d})$.

Evaluating the tame Brauer group of open varieties over local fields

TL;DR

The paper analyzes evaluation maps on the p-torsion and p'-torsion parts of the Brauer group for open varieties over local fields, where the complement is a divisor. It shows that Leray-spectral-sequence-based arguments are not in general sufficient to determine the evaluation maps, and develops a derived-category framework using localisation triangles, Gysin maps, and representable functors to articulate how is controlled by geometric data. The main result states that depends only on the cohomology class , effectively reducing the problem to local intersection data; the argument proceeds by comparing two localisation triangles and extracting the key component , which is shown to be determined by cycle-classes via base-change compatibility. The paper also discusses special cases (e.g. snc divisors with ) where the analysis simplifies, and highlights open questions about the sharpness of the conditions and possible extensions.

Abstract

In this document we let be a smooth variety of pure dimension over a local field with unit ball and residue field of characteristic and we set to be a positive integer such that . For various we study the evaluation map . We suppose that embeds as an open subscheme in a regular scheme that is of finite type over . We assume that is a divisor and we endow it with its reduced scheme structure. We show that for that lift to we obtain the same evaluation map under the two conditions that first, there is an equality of reductions in and second, that holds in .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 18 theorems, 11 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $u\in U(k_v)$ be a point that lifts to $\mathcal{X}(\mathcal{O}_v)$. The evaluation map $\mathrm{Br}(U)(p')\to \mathrm{Br}(k_v)(p')$ depends only on the closed subscheme $Z\cap x$ of $Z$.

Theorems & Definitions (53)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Example 1.1
  • Example 1.2
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Example 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • proof
  • Remark 1.7
  • ...and 43 more