Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Excited core-level dependence of entanglement between a photoelectron and an emitted X-ray photon in X-ray inner-shell excitation

Ryo B. Tanaka, Goro Oohata, Takayuki Uozumi

TL;DR

The paper investigates how excited core-levels influence spin–polarization entanglement between a photoelectron and an emitted X-ray photon in SPR-XEPECS, focusing on Ti2O3-type and CeF3-type systems. It develops a cluster-model framework with a TiO6 site and a Ce3+ ionic model, and uses a density-matrix formalism to quantify entanglement via fidelity and tangle in second-order XEPECS/Spectroscopic processes. The key finding is that entanglement arises from two distinct mechanisms: core $2p$ spin–orbit coupling and a mechanism involving outer $4f$ spin–orbit coupling with strong $4f$–$4d$ exchange, with strong core-level dependence observed (e.g., $3d\rightarrow3p$ in Ti2O3 shows almost no entanglement due to crystal-field effects, while $4f\rightarrow4d$ in CeF3 yields near-maximal entanglement). This work clarifies how core-level selectivity in X-ray inner-shell excitations governs quantum entanglement, offering guidance for future XEPEPS experiments and quantum information applications at X-ray energies.

Abstract

We theoretically investigated how the quantum entanglement between the spin of the photoelectron and the polarization of the emitted X-ray photon depends on the excited core-level, using the 3$d\rightarrow\ $2$p$ and 3$d\rightarrow\ $3$p$ SPR-XEPECS (spin- and polarization-resolved XEPECS) processes for $\rm Ti_{2}O_{3}$-type system, and the 4$f\rightarrow\ $4$d$ SPR-XEPECS process for $\rm CeF_{3}$-type system. In the calculation for $\rm Ti_{2}O_{3}$-type system, we used $\rm TiO_{6}$ cluster model with the full-multiplet structure of the Ti ion and the charge-transfer effect between Ti 3$d$ and ligand O 2$p$ orbitals. For $\rm CeF_{3}$-type system, we used ionic model with the full-multiplet structure of the Ce ion. We found two distinct mechanisms for entanglement generation in the 3$d\rightarrow\ $2$p$ and 4$f\rightarrow\ $4$d$ cases. The first is generated by the spin-orbit interaction of the 2$p$ core electron, whereas the second is generated by the spin-orbit interaction of the 4$f$ valence electron and strong exchange interaction between the 4$f$ and 4$d$ electrons. However, in the 3$d\rightarrow\ $3$p$ case with the strong 3$d-$3$p$ exchange interaction, we found that the entanglement is not generated due to the crystal field effect. These results reveal the existence of two distinct mechanisms for entanglement generation in X-ray inner-shell excitation processes.

Excited core-level dependence of entanglement between a photoelectron and an emitted X-ray photon in X-ray inner-shell excitation

TL;DR

The paper investigates how excited core-levels influence spin–polarization entanglement between a photoelectron and an emitted X-ray photon in SPR-XEPECS, focusing on Ti2O3-type and CeF3-type systems. It develops a cluster-model framework with a TiO6 site and a Ce3+ ionic model, and uses a density-matrix formalism to quantify entanglement via fidelity and tangle in second-order XEPECS/Spectroscopic processes. The key finding is that entanglement arises from two distinct mechanisms: core spin–orbit coupling and a mechanism involving outer spin–orbit coupling with strong exchange, with strong core-level dependence observed (e.g., in Ti2O3 shows almost no entanglement due to crystal-field effects, while in CeF3 yields near-maximal entanglement). This work clarifies how core-level selectivity in X-ray inner-shell excitations governs quantum entanglement, offering guidance for future XEPEPS experiments and quantum information applications at X-ray energies.

Abstract

We theoretically investigated how the quantum entanglement between the spin of the photoelectron and the polarization of the emitted X-ray photon depends on the excited core-level, using the 32 and 33 SPR-XEPECS (spin- and polarization-resolved XEPECS) processes for -type system, and the 44 SPR-XEPECS process for -type system. In the calculation for -type system, we used cluster model with the full-multiplet structure of the Ti ion and the charge-transfer effect between Ti 3 and ligand O 2 orbitals. For -type system, we used ionic model with the full-multiplet structure of the Ce ion. We found two distinct mechanisms for entanglement generation in the 32 and 44 cases. The first is generated by the spin-orbit interaction of the 2 core electron, whereas the second is generated by the spin-orbit interaction of the 4 valence electron and strong exchange interaction between the 4 and 4 electrons. However, in the 33 case with the strong 33 exchange interaction, we found that the entanglement is not generated due to the crystal field effect. These results reveal the existence of two distinct mechanisms for entanglement generation in X-ray inner-shell excitation processes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 12 equations, 6 figures, 1 table.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the $2p$ core-level excitation process ($\Circled{1}\rightarrow\Circled{2}$) and the $3p$ excitation process ($\Circled{1}^{'}\rightarrow\Circled{2}^{'}$) in $\mathrm{Ti_{2}O_{3}}$. While the $2p^{5}$ state is split by $2p$ spin-orbit interaction, the $3p^{5}3d^{1}$ state is split by 3$d-$3$p$ exchange interaction.
  • Figure 2: (a) The spin-resolved 3$p$ XPS, (b) the 3$d\rightarrow\ $3$p$ NXES and XEPECS spectra of $\mathrm{Ti_{2}O_{3}}$-type system. The blue curve in (b) represents the binding energy-integrated NXES spectrum, while the other spectra show the 3$d\rightarrow\ $3$p$ XEPECS at specific binding energies $E_{B} = -3.74$ eV (orange) and $6.32$ eV (green). Each binding energy corresponds to the peak position indicated by the arrow of the same color in (a).
  • Figure 3: (a) 3$d\rightarrow\ $2$p$ SPR-XEPECS at $E_{B}$ = 2.64 eV, for 2$p$ XPS in Fig. 2(a) of ref. [17]. (b) 3$d\rightarrow\ $3$p$ SPR-XEPECS at $E_{B}$ = 6.32 eV in the 3$p$ XPS of Fig. \ref{['Fig.2']}(a)
  • Figure 4: Real (Re) and imaginary (Im) parts of the density matrix calculated at the peak “B” in Fig. \ref{['Fig.3']}(b). The basis states are defined as products of the photoelectron spin (U: up, D: down) and the emitted photon's linear polarization (1: $\lambda_1$, 2: $\lambda_2$).
  • Figure 5: (a) The spin-resolved 4$d$ XPS of $\rm CeF_3$. (b) The 4$f \rightarrow\ $ 4$d$ SPR-XEPECS of $\rm CeF_3$ at the binding energy $E_B = 19.05$ eV indicated by the blue arrow in the inset of (a).
  • ...and 1 more figures