Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sharp Ascent--Descent Spectral Stability under Strong Resolvent Convergence

Marwa Ennaceur

TL;DR

This work addresses the stability of ascent and descent spectra for non-selfadjoint operators under strong resolvent convergence, a setting arising from finite element discretizations of convection–diffusion and Schrödinger-type problems. The authors identify the reduced minimum modulus $\gamma(S)$ as the key closed-range criterion and introduce a computable FEM surrogate $\gamma_h$ that predicts spectral stability and guides mesh refinement. They establish that stability holds under SRS if $\gamma((T-\lambda)^j)>0$ for all intermediate powers, with Kaashoek–Taylor criteria transferred via gap convergence; a Volterra counterexample shows the indispensability of considering all intermediate powers. The framework is validated through model operators and stabilized discretizations (notably SUPG) in 1D and 2D, demonstrating that $\gamma_h>0$ (uniformly) is necessary and sufficient for preserving ascent/descent indices in practice and explaining why norm-resolvent convergence can fail for rough limits. The results provide a practical, rigorous pathway to ensure spectral robustness in realistic computational settings, informing adaptive refinement and stabilization strategies for non-selfadjoint PDE discretizations.

Abstract

We establish sharp stability results for of non--selfadjoint the ascent and descent spectra under strong resolvent convergence (SRS), a natural framework for finite element approximations of non-selfadjoint and singularly perturbed operators. The key quantitative hypothesis is the reduced minimum modulus $γ(T-λ)>0$, which guarantees closed range and enables the transfer of the Kaashoek -- Taylor criteria via gap convergence of operator graphs. At the essential level, B--Fredholm theory extends stability to powers $(T-λ)^m$ provided $γ((T-λ)^j)>0$ for all $1\le j\le m$. We introduce a computable finite-element diagnostic $γ_h = σ_{\min}(M^{-1/2}(A_h-λM)M^{-1/2})$, which serves as a practical surrogate for $γ(T-λ)$ and remains uniformly positive even in convection-dominated regimes when stabilized schemes (e.g., SUPG) are employed. Numerical experiments confirm that $\liminf_{h\to0}γ_h>0$ is both necessary and sufficient for spectral stability, while a Volterra-type counterexample demonstrates the indispensability of the closed-range condition for powers. The analysis clarifies why norm resolvent convergence fails for rough or singular limits, and how SRS-combined with quantitative control of $γ_h$--rescues ascent--descent stability in realistic computational settings.

Sharp Ascent--Descent Spectral Stability under Strong Resolvent Convergence

TL;DR

This work addresses the stability of ascent and descent spectra for non-selfadjoint operators under strong resolvent convergence, a setting arising from finite element discretizations of convection–diffusion and Schrödinger-type problems. The authors identify the reduced minimum modulus as the key closed-range criterion and introduce a computable FEM surrogate that predicts spectral stability and guides mesh refinement. They establish that stability holds under SRS if for all intermediate powers, with Kaashoek–Taylor criteria transferred via gap convergence; a Volterra counterexample shows the indispensability of considering all intermediate powers. The framework is validated through model operators and stabilized discretizations (notably SUPG) in 1D and 2D, demonstrating that (uniformly) is necessary and sufficient for preserving ascent/descent indices in practice and explaining why norm-resolvent convergence can fail for rough limits. The results provide a practical, rigorous pathway to ensure spectral robustness in realistic computational settings, informing adaptive refinement and stabilization strategies for non-selfadjoint PDE discretizations.

Abstract

We establish sharp stability results for of non--selfadjoint the ascent and descent spectra under strong resolvent convergence (SRS), a natural framework for finite element approximations of non-selfadjoint and singularly perturbed operators. The key quantitative hypothesis is the reduced minimum modulus , which guarantees closed range and enables the transfer of the Kaashoek -- Taylor criteria via gap convergence of operator graphs. At the essential level, B--Fredholm theory extends stability to powers provided for all . We introduce a computable finite-element diagnostic , which serves as a practical surrogate for and remains uniformly positive even in convection-dominated regimes when stabilized schemes (e.g., SUPG) are employed. Numerical experiments confirm that is both necessary and sufficient for spectral stability, while a Volterra-type counterexample demonstrates the indispensability of the closed-range condition for powers. The analysis clarifies why norm resolvent convergence fails for rough or singular limits, and how SRS-combined with quantitative control of --rescues ascent--descent stability in realistic computational settings.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 38 sections, 18 theorems, 94 equations, 6 figures, 11 tables, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 3.2

Let $T_n,T$ be closed densely defined operators on $H$ with $T_n \xrightarrow{\mathrm{SRS}} T$. Let $\lambda_n \to \lambda \in \mathbb{C}$, and set $S_n := T_n - \lambda_n$, $S := T - \lambda$.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: From numerical failure to abstract stability. The kernel/range chains stabilize at $\operatorname{asc}(S)$ and $\operatorname{dsc}(S)$. The Kaashoek–Taylor criteria link these to subspace transversality. Under strong resolvent convergence (SRS), graph convergence—and hence stability-is guaranteed precisely when $\gamma((T-\lambda)^j) > 0$ for all intermediate powers. The computable quantity $\gamma_h$ predicts success or failure in practice.
  • Figure 2: Discrete reduced minimum modulus $\gamma_h$ versus mesh size $h$ for the Laplacian $-\partial_x^2$ on $(0,1)$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions and $\lambda = 25$. The eigenvalues satisfy $\zeta_1(h) \downarrow \pi^2 \approx 9.87$ and $\zeta_2(h) \downarrow 4\pi^2 \approx 39.48$ (Rayleigh--Ritz monotonicity, Proposition \ref{['prop:rayleigh-ritz']}). Since $\lambda \in (\pi^2, 4\pi^2)$, we have $\gamma_h = \min\bigl\{|25 - \zeta_1(h)|,\; |\zeta_2(h) - 25|\bigr\} \longrightarrow \min\{25 - \pi^2,\; 4\pi^2 - 25\} \approx 14.48.$ Numerical values are reported in Table \ref{['tab:laplacian']}.
  • Figure 3: Discrete reduced minimum modulus $\gamma_h$ versus mesh size $h$ for convection--diffusion ($\varepsilon=0.02$, $\beta=8$, $c=0$) with $\lambda = -1$. The values remain uniformly bounded away from zero, confirming $\limsup_{h\to0}\gamma(S_h) > 0$. Numerical values are reported in Table \ref{['tab:cd-data']}, which also shows the lower bound $\operatorname{dist}(\lambda, W_M(A_h))$.
  • Figure 4: (a) Discrete reduced minimum modulus $\gamma_h$ for the Schrödinger operator $-\partial_x^2 + V$ with $V \equiv 25$ on $(0,1)$, computed on a mesh with $N = 80$ interior nodes. Since the operator is selfadjoint, $\gamma_h(\lambda) = \operatorname{dist}(\lambda, \sigma(A_h,M))$; the lowest eigenvalue is $\zeta_1(h) \approx 34.87$. (b) $\gamma_h$ for the convection--diffusion operator with $\beta = 50$, $\lambda = -1$, and $h = 1/200$, as a function of $\varepsilon \in [10^{-3},1]$. The minimum value ($\approx 79.38$) confirms that $\gamma_h$ remains uniformly bounded away from zero even in the convection-dominated limit $\varepsilon \to 0$.
  • Figure 5: Convergence rate of the discrete reduced minimum modulus $\gamma_h$ on the L-shaped domain. The reference slope $O(h)$ is shown for comparison. An extrapolated limit $\gamma_\infty \approx 2.60$ is used. The observed linear decay in the log--log scale confirms the theoretical expectation of $O(h)$ convergence, consistent with reduced elliptic regularity due to the reentrant corner.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (53)

  • Remark 3.1: Why SRS is natural in applications
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:SRS']}
  • Remark 3.5
  • Remark 3.6
  • Remark 3.7: On selecting the power level $m$ in practice
  • ...and 43 more