Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hall's Harem Theorem with controlled sizes of cycles

Karol Duda

TL;DR

This work proves a new variant of Hall's Harem Theorem for fully reflected, locally finite bipartite graphs, yielding a perfect $(1,d-1)$-matching realized by a unary function $f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ with controlled cycle sizes. The authors present an inductive construction that preserves $U^{(n)}$-reflectedness and the Hall $d$-harem condition at each step, while engineering cycles so that every element eventually reaches a periodic point and cycle lengths are effectively bounded. The approach extends the classical Hall framework with the notion of reflections and a carefully orchestrated sequence of $(1,d)$-fans, enabling a controllable dynamical behavior of $f$ and establishing independence from the companion computable version arXiv:2105.06304. The results have potential implications for computable amenability contexts and related coarse-geometric constructions, by providing a classical, noncomputable route to the same cycle-control phenomenon.

Abstract

We prove a new version of Hall's Harem Theorem, where the final matching is realized by a unary function with additional conditions on behavior of cycles. The present paper can be considered as a helpful companion of the paper of the author: arXiv:2105.06304, where a computable version of Hall's Harem Theorem with controlled sizes of cycles is proved. These two versions of Hall's Harem Theorem are independent: none of them follows from the other one.

Hall's Harem Theorem with controlled sizes of cycles

TL;DR

This work proves a new variant of Hall's Harem Theorem for fully reflected, locally finite bipartite graphs, yielding a perfect -matching realized by a unary function with controlled cycle sizes. The authors present an inductive construction that preserves -reflectedness and the Hall -harem condition at each step, while engineering cycles so that every element eventually reaches a periodic point and cycle lengths are effectively bounded. The approach extends the classical Hall framework with the notion of reflections and a carefully orchestrated sequence of -fans, enabling a controllable dynamical behavior of and establishing independence from the companion computable version arXiv:2105.06304. The results have potential implications for computable amenability contexts and related coarse-geometric constructions, by providing a classical, noncomputable route to the same cycle-control phenomenon.

Abstract

We prove a new version of Hall's Harem Theorem, where the final matching is realized by a unary function with additional conditions on behavior of cycles. The present paper can be considered as a helpful companion of the paper of the author: arXiv:2105.06304, where a computable version of Hall's Harem Theorem with controlled sizes of cycles is proved. These two versions of Hall's Harem Theorem are independent: none of them follows from the other one.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 7 theorems, 49 equations, 10 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.3

csc Let $\Gamma=(U,V,E)$ be a locally finite graph and let $k\in \mathbb{N},\; k\geq 1$. The following conditions are equivalent:

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: The first part of the first step, $\mathfrak{M}^1_{0}$-fan of $u_0$ in red and green, $M^0_0$ in green.
  • Figure 2: Step 1, part 2. $\mathfrak{M}^2_{0}$ is red. We want the edge $(u^{1}_0, v_{u_0})$ to be in $M_0$. Force the situation from Figure 4.
  • Figure 3: $M^1_{0}$ is green. It is possible that the purple fan consisting of edges $(\dot{u}^{\perp}_0,\dot{v}^{\perp}_{0,1}),(\dot{u}^{\perp}_0,\dot{v}^{\perp}_{0,2})$ will be added to $\Gamma^{(1)\perp}$.
  • Figure 4: $\Gamma^{(n)\star}$ is black, $\Gamma^{(n)\perp}$ is purple.
  • Figure 5: $\mathfrak{M}^n_1$ is red and green, $M_n^0$ is green. We have $v_{u_n}=v^{\perp}_{j_0,2}$.
  • ...and 5 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: Hall's Harem theorem
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6
  • Claim 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Claim 3.3
  • Claim 3.4
  • ...and 19 more