Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$B^+\to K^+ ν\barν$ Excess and DM semi-annihilation

Jongkuk Kim, Pyungwon Ko

TL;DR

This work targets the Belle II B^+ → K^+ νν̄ excess by embedding a scalar DM sector into a dark U(1)_{L_μ-L_τ} that is spontaneously broken to a local Z3. The neutral DM X interacts via a light Z' mediator (m_{Z'} ~ 10 MeV) and a dark Higgs H1 (m_{H1} ~ 2 GeV), enabling DM semi-annihilation channels XX → X̄Z' and XX → X̄H1 to set the relic density while also generating a missing-energy signal in B decays through B^+ → K^+ H1 (or K^+ Z' Z' in three-body decays). With small mixing sinθ and modest g_X, the model can explain both the Belle II excess and the Planck relic abundance, while evading stringent CMB, direct-detection, and Higgs invisible-width constraints; potential IceCube and GC neutrino signals from semi-annihilation offer avenues for future tests. The viability of the Belle II region depends on Higgs invisible width limits, but portions of parameter space remain accessible to future e^+e^- colliders and neutrino observatories.

Abstract

In 2023, Belle II collaboration announced the observarion of the $B^+ \to K^+ ν\barν$ decay channel for the first time. This decay channel provides a clean signal with high precision in theoretical calculation. However, we encounter $2.8σ$ deviation from the Standard Model (SM) prediction. To resolve this excess, we study scalar dark matter (DM) model with local discrete $Z_3$ symmetry. Assuming dark $U(1)_X \equiv U(1)_{L_μ- L_τ}$ symmetry, this $U(1)_{L_μ- L_τ}$ symmetry is spontaneously broken into local discrete $Z_3$ by non-zero vacuum expectation value of dark Higgs boson. Considering dark Higgs mass is $2$GeV, we can explain the recent ${\rm Br} (B^+ \to K^+ ν\barν)$ excess reported from Belle II collaboration and relic abundance at the same time.

$B^+\to K^+ ν\barν$ Excess and DM semi-annihilation

TL;DR

This work targets the Belle II B^+ → K^+ νν̄ excess by embedding a scalar DM sector into a dark U(1)_{L_μ-L_τ} that is spontaneously broken to a local Z3. The neutral DM X interacts via a light Z' mediator (m_{Z'} ~ 10 MeV) and a dark Higgs H1 (m_{H1} ~ 2 GeV), enabling DM semi-annihilation channels XX → X̄Z' and XX → X̄H1 to set the relic density while also generating a missing-energy signal in B decays through B^+ → K^+ H1 (or K^+ Z' Z' in three-body decays). With small mixing sinθ and modest g_X, the model can explain both the Belle II excess and the Planck relic abundance, while evading stringent CMB, direct-detection, and Higgs invisible-width constraints; potential IceCube and GC neutrino signals from semi-annihilation offer avenues for future tests. The viability of the Belle II region depends on Higgs invisible width limits, but portions of parameter space remain accessible to future e^+e^- colliders and neutrino observatories.

Abstract

In 2023, Belle II collaboration announced the observarion of the decay channel for the first time. This decay channel provides a clean signal with high precision in theoretical calculation. However, we encounter deviation from the Standard Model (SM) prediction. To resolve this excess, we study scalar dark matter (DM) model with local discrete symmetry. Assuming dark symmetry, this symmetry is spontaneously broken into local discrete by non-zero vacuum expectation value of dark Higgs boson. Considering dark Higgs mass is GeV, we can explain the recent excess reported from Belle II collaboration and relic abundance at the same time.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 42 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Feynman diagrams for dark matter semi-annihilation.
  • Figure 2: The relic density in the $(m_X,\, \lambda_3)$ plane is shown. We fix $m_{Z'} = 10~\mathrm{MeV}$, $m_{H_1} = 2~\mathrm{GeV}$, and $\sin\theta = 3 \times 10^{-3}$ to account for the Belle II excess. The impact of varying $\sin\theta$ is negligible due to its small value. The red solid line corresponds to the observed dark matter relic density measured by Planck Planck:2018vyg. To the left (right) of the dashed vertical line, the relic abundance is dominantly determined by the process $XX \to \bar{X}Z'$ ($XX \to \bar{X}Z',\, \bar{X}H_1$), respectively.
  • Figure 3: Allowed $(m_X,~g_X)$ space when $m_{Z'} = 10~\mathrm{MeV}$. The blue-shaded region is excluded by the DAMIC-M result DAMIC-M:2025luv, while the green area is ruled out by the bound $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$. The purple region is excluded by the NA64 NA64:2024klw. The light-cyan band is disfavored by the latest muon $(g-2)$ measurement at $\Delta a_\mu > 10^{-10}$. Finally, the gray-shaded area is constrained by the current dark matter direct detection limits.
  • Figure 4: The regions allowed at the $1\sigma$ and $2\sigma$ CL by the Belle II excess correspond to the areas enclosed within the green (inner) and yellow (outer) shaded bands, respectively. We adopt $g_X = 10^{-4}$ for the left panel and $g_X = 10^{-5}$ for the right panel. The red-shaded region is excluded by the constraint from the invisible decay width of the SM Higgs boson ATLAS:2023tktCMS:2023sdw. For 3-body decay case, the preferred region is already ruled out by the Higgs invisible decay bound. However, the parameter space can be partially reopened when the couplings $\lambda_{X\Phi}$ and/or $\lambda_{H\Phi}$ are nonzero. The gray-shaded area denotes the parameter region excluded by $K^+ \to \pi^+ + {\rm inv.}$, $K^0_L \to \pi^0 \nu\bar{\nu}$, and $B^0 \to K^{*0} \nu\bar{\nu}$NA62:2021zjwKOTO:2020prkBelle:2017oht.