Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Modeling of turbulence kinetic energy added by wind-turbine wakes in the atmospheric boundary layer

Bowen Du, Jingshan Zhu, Baoliang Li, Mingwei Ge, Xintao Li, Yongqian Liu

TL;DR

The paper tackles predicting wake-added turbulence kinetic energy ($k_w$) in wind-turbine wakes within the atmospheric boundary layer by proposing a physics-based two-submodule framework that yields a closed-form azimuthally-averaged $k_w$ and a ground-effect correction $\delta_{k_w}$, enabling end-to-end three-dimensional predictions from basic inflow and turbine operating conditions. The azimuthally averaged module is derived from a simplified $k$-budget in cylindrical coordinates and solved analytically via a Green's-function approach, with parameters ($U_\rho$, $\nu_t$, $\Psi$) determined from LES data and a near-wake Super-Gaussian velocity deficit for $U_\rho$. The ground-effect term is modeled with a unified, self-similar form that is Gaussian in radius and sinusoidal in azimuth, with parameters ($r_{\delta}$, $\sigma_{\delta}$, $B$, $C$) calibrated from LES. Validation against LES calibrations and public wind-tunnel/LES datasets yields $\text{NMAE}$ below 12% (average ~8.13%), demonstrating robustness and practical potential for engineering assessments of wake recovery and downstream fatigue loads.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) added by wind-turbine wakes is of significant scientific value for understanding the wake recovery mechanisms. Furthermore, this physical quantity is a critical input for engineering applications. In this study, we propose a novel wake-added TKE prediction model capable of accurately predict the three-dimensional spatial distribution of wake-added TKE using only basic inflow and wind turbine operation conditions as inputs. The model consists of two sub-modules: one for calculating the azimuthally-averaged wake-added TKE and the other for determining the ground effect correction function. The calculation of the azimuthally-averaged wake-added TKE is based on the analytical solution derived from the corresponding wake-added TKE budget, while the ground effect correction function is determined using a unified functional form, owing to its self-similarity. To ensure the closure of these two sub-modules, we develop methods for determining all free parameters based on the large-eddy simulation (LES) cases. This results in an end-to-end prediction framework, enabling direct engineering applications of the proposed model. We compared the proposed model with LES calibration data and publicly available validation datasets from the literature, which include LES and wind tunnel experiments under various inflow and turbine operating conditions. The comparison results show that the proposed model can accurately predict the spatial distribution of wake-added TKE, particularly capturing the vertical asymmetry of wake-added TKE and the streamwise evolution of the hub-height wake-added TKE profile. The averaged normalized mean absolute error of the proposed model across all validation datasets is only 8.13%, demonstrating its robustness and broad applicability.

Modeling of turbulence kinetic energy added by wind-turbine wakes in the atmospheric boundary layer

TL;DR

The paper tackles predicting wake-added turbulence kinetic energy () in wind-turbine wakes within the atmospheric boundary layer by proposing a physics-based two-submodule framework that yields a closed-form azimuthally-averaged and a ground-effect correction , enabling end-to-end three-dimensional predictions from basic inflow and turbine operating conditions. The azimuthally averaged module is derived from a simplified -budget in cylindrical coordinates and solved analytically via a Green's-function approach, with parameters (, , ) determined from LES data and a near-wake Super-Gaussian velocity deficit for . The ground-effect term is modeled with a unified, self-similar form that is Gaussian in radius and sinusoidal in azimuth, with parameters (, , , ) calibrated from LES. Validation against LES calibrations and public wind-tunnel/LES datasets yields below 12% (average ~8.13%), demonstrating robustness and practical potential for engineering assessments of wake recovery and downstream fatigue loads.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) added by wind-turbine wakes is of significant scientific value for understanding the wake recovery mechanisms. Furthermore, this physical quantity is a critical input for engineering applications. In this study, we propose a novel wake-added TKE prediction model capable of accurately predict the three-dimensional spatial distribution of wake-added TKE using only basic inflow and wind turbine operation conditions as inputs. The model consists of two sub-modules: one for calculating the azimuthally-averaged wake-added TKE and the other for determining the ground effect correction function. The calculation of the azimuthally-averaged wake-added TKE is based on the analytical solution derived from the corresponding wake-added TKE budget, while the ground effect correction function is determined using a unified functional form, owing to its self-similarity. To ensure the closure of these two sub-modules, we develop methods for determining all free parameters based on the large-eddy simulation (LES) cases. This results in an end-to-end prediction framework, enabling direct engineering applications of the proposed model. We compared the proposed model with LES calibration data and publicly available validation datasets from the literature, which include LES and wind tunnel experiments under various inflow and turbine operating conditions. The comparison results show that the proposed model can accurately predict the spatial distribution of wake-added TKE, particularly capturing the vertical asymmetry of wake-added TKE and the streamwise evolution of the hub-height wake-added TKE profile. The averaged normalized mean absolute error of the proposed model across all validation datasets is only 8.13%, demonstrating its robustness and broad applicability.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 32 equations, 15 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (15)

  • Figure 1: Schematics of the assumed profiles of wake-added streamwise turbulence intensity for (a) the 3D-Gaussian model17ishihara2018new, (b) the 3D-Gaussian-Cos model18li2022novel, and (c) the 3D-Cos model19tian2022new. (The dashed line represents the wake boundary, and the dot-dashed line indicates the peak position of wake-added turbulence.)
  • Figure 2: Vertical profiles of the time- and horizontally-averaged (a) normalized inflow wind velocity, (b) normalized TKE, and (c) normalized shear stress in the precursor domain for different cases. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the top-tip, hub, and bottom-tip heights.
  • Figure 3: Contourfs of (a1-a3) the wake-added TKE, (b1-b3) the azimuthally-averaged wake-added TKE, and (c1-c3) the ground effect correction term at different locations downstream of the wind turbine for the NBL-3 case. The black dashed line represents the boundary of the rotor swept region.
  • Figure 4: Contourfs of (a1-a3) the wake-added advection term $\mathcal{A}^w$, (b1-b3) the wake-added turbulent transport term $\mathcal{T}_t^w$, (c1-c3) the wake-added dissipation term $\mathcal{D}^w$, and (d1-d3) the wake-added shear production term $\mathcal{P}_s^w$ of the simplified wake-added TKE budget at different locations downstream of the wind turbine for the NBL-3 case. The black dashed line represents the boundary of the rotor swept region.
  • Figure 5: Comparison of (a1-a4) the full terms in Eq. (\ref{['eq6']}), (b1-b4) their dominant components in Eq. (\ref{['eq9']}), and (c1-c4) the modeled dominant components in Eq. (\ref{['eq13']}) for the NBL-3 case.
  • ...and 10 more figures