Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Latent-space metrics for Complex-Valued VAE out-of-distribution detection under radar clutter

Y. A. Rouzoumka, E. Terreaux, C. Morisseau, J. -P. Ovarlez, C. Ren

TL;DR

The problem addressed is robust radar out-of-distribution detection under clutter, tackled with complex-valued VAEs trained under the complex-valued ELBO $L_{CVAE} = L_{rec} + \beta D_{KL}$. The paper compares three detectors—reconstruction-based CVAE_MSE, an empirical latent KL score, and a Hermitian Mahalanobis score—against the classical ANMF-Tyler detector across synthetic Gaussian and compound-Gaussian clutter as well as CSIR real data. Key findings show CVAE_MSE leading in synthetic scenarios, while ANMF-FP dominates under compound clutter and Mahalanobis improves Doppler-0 robustness on real data; KLD is consistently brittle. The results provide practical guidelines for selecting reconstruction, latent-space, or classical detectors depending on clutter realism and the Doppler cell, highlighting the value of modeling complex latent structure for radar OOD detection.

Abstract

We investigate complex-valued Variational AutoEncoders (CVAE) for radar Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) detection in complex radar environments. We proposed several detection metrics: the reconstruction error of CVAE (CVAE-MSE), the latent-based scores (Mahalanobis, Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD)), and compared their performance against the classical ANMF-Tyler detector (ANMF-FP). The performance of all these detectors is analyzed on synthetic and experimental radar data, showing the advantages and the weaknesses of each detector.

Latent-space metrics for Complex-Valued VAE out-of-distribution detection under radar clutter

TL;DR

The problem addressed is robust radar out-of-distribution detection under clutter, tackled with complex-valued VAEs trained under the complex-valued ELBO . The paper compares three detectors—reconstruction-based CVAE_MSE, an empirical latent KL score, and a Hermitian Mahalanobis score—against the classical ANMF-Tyler detector across synthetic Gaussian and compound-Gaussian clutter as well as CSIR real data. Key findings show CVAE_MSE leading in synthetic scenarios, while ANMF-FP dominates under compound clutter and Mahalanobis improves Doppler-0 robustness on real data; KLD is consistently brittle. The results provide practical guidelines for selecting reconstruction, latent-space, or classical detectors depending on clutter realism and the Doppler cell, highlighting the value of modeling complex latent structure for radar OOD detection.

Abstract

We investigate complex-valued Variational AutoEncoders (CVAE) for radar Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) detection in complex radar environments. We proposed several detection metrics: the reconstruction error of CVAE (CVAE-MSE), the latent-based scores (Mahalanobis, Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD)), and compared their performance against the classical ANMF-Tyler detector (ANMF-FP). The performance of all these detectors is analyzed on synthetic and experimental radar data, showing the advantages and the weaknesses of each detector.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 10 equations, 3 figures, 2 algorithms.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Complex-Valued VAE network architecture
  • Figure 2: Detection performance under different noise configurations, ($P_{fa}= 10^{-2}$).
  • Figure 3: On the left: range-slow time map. On the right: Doppler-pulse spectrogram for range bin 5605.