Hard exclusive photoproduction of photon-meson pairs: pseudoscalar channels $π$, $η$ and $η'$
Nikola Crnković, Goran Duplančić, Saad Nabeebaccus, Kornelija Passek-K., Bernard Pire, Lech Szymanowski, Samuel Wallon
TL;DR
The paper develops a leading-twist, leading-order QCD framework for hard exclusive photoproduction of photon–meson pairs γN → γM N′ with pseudoscalar mesons, deriving compact analytical expressions for quark GPD contributions and including two-gluon DA components for η and η′. It employs the GK GPD model, collinear factorization, and a pion-pole treatment to produce CMFFs that drive fully differential, single-differential, and integrated cross sections in the moderate-ξ region. Key findings include a strong pion-pole impact in γπ channels, notable gluon contributions in γη′ production, and a pronounced sensitivity to the pion DA shape, all of which come with sizable LO-scale uncertainties that necessitate NLO corrections. The results offer a transparent analytical baseline and numerical predictions to support future experimental tests and refinements of GPDs and meson DAs.
Abstract
We investigate the hard exclusive photoproduction of photon-meson pairs at leading-twist and leading-order in perturbative QCD, and focus on pseudoscalar mesons $\text{M} \in \{π^\pm, π^0, η, η'\}$. Compact analytical expressions are obtained for the amplitudes involving quark generalized parton distributions, with the two-gluon components of the $η$ and $η'$ distribution amplitudes included. The numerical analysis is performed in the moderate-$ξ$ region, where valence-quark GPDs are expected to be important. In this region, we find a strong impact of the pion-pole term in $γπ^\pm$ production, and a non-negligible effect for neutral mesons. We also observe a marked dependence of $γη'$ photoproduction on two-gluon contributions. This process offers enhanced sensitivity to the shape of the GPDs already at leading-order, while the tested dependence on the meson distribution amplitude and the renormalization scale introduces further theoretical uncertainties, the latter emphasizing the need for next-to-leading-order corrections. Our results provide a concise analytical framework and a numerical baseline for future studies.
