Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sequential Fragmentation of C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) After Its Near-Sun Passage

Dennis Bodewits, John W. Noonan, Michael S. P. Kelley, Carrie E. Holt, Tim A. Lister, Helen Usher, Colin Snodgrass

Abstract

Comet C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) reached perihelion at 0.33~au on 2025 October 8. Daily monitoring by the LCO Outbursting Objects Key Project revealed a major activity increase between November 2 and 4, accompanied by rapid changes in coma morphology. Serendipitous HST/STIS acquisition images obtained on November 8-10 captured the comet only days after this event and resolved five fragments, providing an early high-resolution view of a nucleus in the process of disruption. Fragment motions and morphologies indicate a hierarchical fragmentation sequence, including a slow secondary split of fragment II. Back-extrapolation shows that both the primary and secondary breakups preceded their associated photometric outbursts by roughly one to three days. This consistent lag, together with the appearance of thin, short-lived arclets around fragment A in the first HST epoch, suggests that freshly exposed interior material warms rapidly but requires time before dust can be released efficiently. These combined ground- and space-based observations provide rare, time-resolved constraints on the thermal and structural evolution of a fragmented comet near perihelion and highlight the scientific value of capturing a nucleus within days of disruption.

Sequential Fragmentation of C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) After Its Near-Sun Passage

Abstract

Comet C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) reached perihelion at 0.33~au on 2025 October 8. Daily monitoring by the LCO Outbursting Objects Key Project revealed a major activity increase between November 2 and 4, accompanied by rapid changes in coma morphology. Serendipitous HST/STIS acquisition images obtained on November 8-10 captured the comet only days after this event and resolved five fragments, providing an early high-resolution view of a nucleus in the process of disruption. Fragment motions and morphologies indicate a hierarchical fragmentation sequence, including a slow secondary split of fragment II. Back-extrapolation shows that both the primary and secondary breakups preceded their associated photometric outbursts by roughly one to three days. This consistent lag, together with the appearance of thin, short-lived arclets around fragment A in the first HST epoch, suggests that freshly exposed interior material warms rapidly but requires time before dust can be released efficiently. These combined ground- and space-based observations provide rare, time-resolved constraints on the thermal and structural evolution of a fragmented comet near perihelion and highlight the scientific value of capturing a nucleus within days of disruption.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 3 figures, 1 table.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: LOOK r-band photometry of C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) measured in a circular aperture of 10,000 km in radius (orange squares).HST/STIS photometry within a similarly-sized aperture were bootstrapped to the Nov. 10 LOOK data and are depicted by blue triangles. The inset panel presents the absolute magnitudes of the individual fragments obtained from HST/STIS (cf. Fig. \ref{['FIG:HST']}): open triangles denote fragment I; black, open, and grey squares represent fragments II, IIa, and IIb, respectively; grey circles indicate fragment IV (magnitudes of IV are decreased by $-2$ mag to aid visualization).
  • Figure 2: LCO images r-band acquired on Nov. 4.51 (left; after large outburst), Nov. 7.46 (center; 1.1 day before the first HST observation), and Nov. 10.23 (right; 7.5 hr before the last HST observation). The stretch is logarithmic and the color scale is the same in all three images.
  • Figure 3: HST/STIS MIRVIS images of C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) obtained on 2025 Nov. 8.56 (left), Nov. 9.82 (center), and Nov. 10.54 (right). Each panel uses a logarithmic stretch with the same physical and intensity scale. The field of view is $20\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$} \times 15\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}$, corresponding to roughly $9{,}000 \times 6{,}500$ km at the comet. Fragments are labeled following the notation introduced in the text: the two brightest components (I and II) are present in the first epoch, with fainter fragments III and IV located progressively farther along the projected orbit. By the second epoch, fragment II has separated into components IIa and IIb, and the relative motions and evolving morphologies of all fragments are evident, including arclets around I, a parabolic inner coma around II, the forward fan of IV, and the fading of III. In the final panel, the brightening and coma development of fragment IIb are clearly visible. Grayscale values represent counts in a 21.5 s exposure.