Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Equivariant Koszul Duality, Modular Category $\mathcal{O}$, and Periodic Kazhdan--Lusztig Polynomials

Simon Riche, Quan Situ

Abstract

Let $G$ be a connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic, $\mathfrak{g}$ be its Lie algebra, and $B$ be a Borel subgroup. We prove a formula for the dimensions of extension groups, in the principal block of the category of strongly $B$-equivariant $\mathfrak{g}$-modules (also called modular category $\mathcal{O}$), from a simple object to a costandard object, under the assumption that Lusztig's conjecture holds (which is known in large characteristic). The answer is given by a coefficient of a periodic Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomial associated with the corresponding affine Weyl group. Among other things, the proof uses a torus-equivariant version of the Koszul duality for $\mathfrak{g}$-modules constructed by the first author.

Equivariant Koszul Duality, Modular Category $\mathcal{O}$, and Periodic Kazhdan--Lusztig Polynomials

Abstract

Let be a connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic, be its Lie algebra, and be a Borel subgroup. We prove a formula for the dimensions of extension groups, in the principal block of the category of strongly -equivariant -modules (also called modular category ), from a simple object to a costandard object, under the assumption that Lusztig's conjecture holds (which is known in large characteristic). The answer is given by a coefficient of a periodic Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomial associated with the corresponding affine Weyl group. Among other things, the proof uses a torus-equivariant version of the Koszul duality for -modules constructed by the first author.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 78 sections, 51 theorems, 380 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume that $p>h$, and that Lusztig's conjecture holds. Then for any $y,w \in W_\mathrm{aff}$ we have

Theorems & Definitions (119)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof : Sketch of proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof : Sketch of proof
  • Remark 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • ...and 109 more