Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Intrinsic Timed Hausdorff Convergence and Its Implications

R. Perales

TL;DR

This work clarifies how intrinsic timed-Hausdorff convergence in timed-metric-spaces governs classical Gromov–Hausdorff convergence and the specialized big bang and future-developed convergence notions. By formulating timed-Fréchet maps and the $d_{\tau-H}$ distance, the authors prove that $d_{\tau-H}\to 0$ controls $d_{GH}\to 0$, and they derive BB-GH and FD-HH implications when the spaces possess big bang or future-developed structure, including reversibility in certain settings. The results connect the timed-metric framework to Lorentzian convergence concepts without relying on compactness/embedding theorems, aligning with SakSor-Notions Conjectures 6.1–6.5 and offering a unified hierarchy of convergence notions. This provides a rigorous bridge between timelike and timeless geometric convergence, with potential applications to the study of Lorentzian manifolds and their limits in a purely metric context.

Abstract

Sakovich--Sormani introduced several notions of distance between certain classes of Lorentzian manifolds. These distances use the Hausdorff and Gromov--Hausdorff distances and therefore extend naturally to a broader class of spaces. Here we show that, for timed metric spaces, intrinsic timed--Hausdorff convergence implies (timeless) Gromov--Hausdorff convergence as well as big bang convergence, among other related implications.

Intrinsic Timed Hausdorff Convergence and Its Implications

TL;DR

This work clarifies how intrinsic timed-Hausdorff convergence in timed-metric-spaces governs classical Gromov–Hausdorff convergence and the specialized big bang and future-developed convergence notions. By formulating timed-Fréchet maps and the distance, the authors prove that controls , and they derive BB-GH and FD-HH implications when the spaces possess big bang or future-developed structure, including reversibility in certain settings. The results connect the timed-metric framework to Lorentzian convergence concepts without relying on compactness/embedding theorems, aligning with SakSor-Notions Conjectures 6.1–6.5 and offering a unified hierarchy of convergence notions. This provides a rigorous bridge between timelike and timeless geometric convergence, with potential applications to the study of Lorentzian manifolds and their limits in a purely metric context.

Abstract

Sakovich--Sormani introduced several notions of distance between certain classes of Lorentzian manifolds. These distances use the Hausdorff and Gromov--Hausdorff distances and therefore extend naturally to a broader class of spaces. Here we show that, for timed metric spaces, intrinsic timed--Hausdorff convergence implies (timeless) Gromov--Hausdorff convergence as well as big bang convergence, among other related implications.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 9 theorems, 91 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

If $(X_j,d_j, \tau_j)$, $j \in \mathbb N$, and $(X_\infty, d_\infty, \tau_\infty)$ are compact timed-metric-spaces converging in the intrinsic timed Hausdorff sense as in Definition defn:tau-K-dist, then we have (timeless) Gromov-Hausdorff convergence:

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2: Part of Conjecture 6.1 in SakSor-Notions
  • Theorem 1.3: Part of Conjecture 6.2 in SakSor-Notions
  • Theorem 1.4: c.f. Conjecture 6.3 in SakSor-Notions
  • Theorem 1.5: Part of Conjecture 6.4 in SakSor-Notions
  • Theorem 1.6: Part of Conjecture 6.5 in SakSor-Notions
  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • ...and 15 more