Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the resolution of categorical symmetries in (Non-) Unitary Rational CFTs

Arpan Bhattacharyya, Saptaswa Ghosh, Sounak Pal, Jagannath Santara

TL;DR

This work develops a general, SymTFT-free RCFT framework for symmetry-resolved entanglement entropy (SREE) governed by categorical symmetries. By expressing SREE directly through modular data and boundary-state constructions, it covers unitary and non-unitary, diagonal and non-diagonal RCFTs, including fusion multiplicities, and examines various boundary types (weakly/strongly symmetric and cloaking). The authors provide explicit calculations in Ising, M(6,5), SU(2)_{10} E6-type theories, the three-state Potts model, and several Haagerup–Izumi theories, uncovering when full sector resolution is possible and when it requires auxiliary boundary-defect data. The results illuminate how boundary conditions and fusion category structure shape entanglement distributions, offering a unified lens to study categorical symmetries in 2D critical systems and guiding extensions to non-unitary and non-diagonal contexts.

Abstract

We explore several aspects of the categorical symmetry-resolved entanglement entropy (SREE) in two-dimensional Rational Conformal Field Theories (RCFTs) and express it directly in terms of the modular data of the theory. Motivated by arXiv:2409.02806, we provide a general formula for SREE that applies to symmetric (weakly/strongly) and cloaking boundary conditions as well as for fusion rings with multiplicities without invoking any SymTFT construction, relying instead on a purely 2d RCFT analysis. We check the formula against several explicit examples. Additionally, we study symmetry resolution for both categorical and invertible symmetries in (non-)diagonal RCFTs and comment on the subtleties that arise in these cases. Finally, we extend our analysis to diagonal non-unitary RCFTs, focusing on theories with generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular data, and find full agreement with the given formula.

On the resolution of categorical symmetries in (Non-) Unitary Rational CFTs

TL;DR

This work develops a general, SymTFT-free RCFT framework for symmetry-resolved entanglement entropy (SREE) governed by categorical symmetries. By expressing SREE directly through modular data and boundary-state constructions, it covers unitary and non-unitary, diagonal and non-diagonal RCFTs, including fusion multiplicities, and examines various boundary types (weakly/strongly symmetric and cloaking). The authors provide explicit calculations in Ising, M(6,5), SU(2)_{10} E6-type theories, the three-state Potts model, and several Haagerup–Izumi theories, uncovering when full sector resolution is possible and when it requires auxiliary boundary-defect data. The results illuminate how boundary conditions and fusion category structure shape entanglement distributions, offering a unified lens to study categorical symmetries in 2D critical systems and guiding extensions to non-unitary and non-diagonal contexts.

Abstract

We explore several aspects of the categorical symmetry-resolved entanglement entropy (SREE) in two-dimensional Rational Conformal Field Theories (RCFTs) and express it directly in terms of the modular data of the theory. Motivated by arXiv:2409.02806, we provide a general formula for SREE that applies to symmetric (weakly/strongly) and cloaking boundary conditions as well as for fusion rings with multiplicities without invoking any SymTFT construction, relying instead on a purely 2d RCFT analysis. We check the formula against several explicit examples. Additionally, we study symmetry resolution for both categorical and invertible symmetries in (non-)diagonal RCFTs and comment on the subtleties that arise in these cases. Finally, we extend our analysis to diagonal non-unitary RCFTs, focusing on theories with generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular data, and find full agreement with the given formula.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 125 equations, 2 figures, 8 tables.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Inserting a topological defect line($\mathcal{L}$) along the Euclidean time direction (left), which, after the conformal transformation (from cylinder to plane), acts on the local operator (right).
  • Figure 2: For a set of intervals A and B, as the Hilbert space is not a direct product, we have put conformal boundary conditions with two small $\epsilon$ circles at the entangling surface, which turn into two different Cardy boundary states after conformal mapping to an annulus.