Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A sharp threshold for arithmetic effects on the tail probabilities of lacunary sums

Christoph Aistleitner, Lorenz Fruehwirth, Joscha Prochno

TL;DR

The paper investigates how tail probabilities for lacunary sums $S_N(x)=\sum_{k=1}^N f(n_k x)$ transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian behavior as arithmetic constraints tighten. It shows a sharp cutoff governed by the two-variable Diophantine count $L(N,a,b)$: if $L(N,a,b)=O(N/g_N)$, then tails behave like a normal distribution up to fluctuations of order $\sqrt{2\log g_N}$; this threshold is proven to be essentially optimal. The authors establish a sufficiency result via a martingale approach with block decompositions and Grama-type CLT bounds, and a matching necessity by constructing lacunary sequences that preserve the Diophantine bound yet produce tail deviations beyond the threshold. The results illuminate the precise arithmetic-analytic balance controlling tail probabilities for general lacunary sums and extend earlier CLT/LIL findings for special cases. The methods merge harmonic analysis, Diophantine estimates, and probabilistic martingale techniques to quantify when Gaussian intuition persists.

Abstract

A classical observation in analysis asserts that lacunary systems of dilated functions show many properties which are also typical for systems of independent random variables. For example, if $(n_k)_{k \ge 1}$ is a sequence of integers satisfying the Hadamard gap condition $n_{k+1}/n_k\ge q > 1,~k \ge 1$, then the normalized sums $\sum_{n=1}^N \cos(2πn_k x)$, considered on the probability space $[0,1]$ with Borel $σ$-field and Lebesgue measure, satisfy the central limit theorem (CLT) and the law of the iterated logarithm (LIL). Remarkably, the situation becomes much more deliacate when the trigonometric function $\cos(2 πx)$ is replaced by a more general 1-periodic function $f$, and fine arithmetic properties of the sequence $(n_k)_{k \ge 1}$ come into play. The most relevant arithmetic property can be phrased in terms of the number of solutions of certain 2-variable Diophantine equations. Recently, the authors proved that the validity of the LIL requires a strictly stronger Diophantine criterion than the CLT. In the present paper we show that this is only a special case of a wide-ranging general principle: there is a sharp cutoff, which can be expressed in form of a Diophantine criterion on the sequence $(n_k)_{k \ge 1}$, at which the tail probabilities of $\sum_{k=1}^N f(n_k x)$ change from Gaussian to potentially erratic behavior. More precisely, let $L(N,a,b,c)$ be the number of solutions $(k,\ell)$ of the equation $a n_k - b n_\ell= c$, where $1\leq k,\ell \leq N$. Roughly speaking, we prove: if $L(N,a,b,c) \le N / g_N$ for some $g_N$, then $\mathbb{P} \left[\sum_{k=1}^N f(n_k x) > t \|f\|_2 \sqrt{N} \right]$ is asymptotically is accordance with standard normal behavior for all $t$ up to $\sqrt{2 \log g_N}$. We also show that this criterion is optimal in the sense that under the same premises, the conclusion can fail to be true for values of $t$ beyond this threshold.

A sharp threshold for arithmetic effects on the tail probabilities of lacunary sums

TL;DR

The paper investigates how tail probabilities for lacunary sums transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian behavior as arithmetic constraints tighten. It shows a sharp cutoff governed by the two-variable Diophantine count : if , then tails behave like a normal distribution up to fluctuations of order ; this threshold is proven to be essentially optimal. The authors establish a sufficiency result via a martingale approach with block decompositions and Grama-type CLT bounds, and a matching necessity by constructing lacunary sequences that preserve the Diophantine bound yet produce tail deviations beyond the threshold. The results illuminate the precise arithmetic-analytic balance controlling tail probabilities for general lacunary sums and extend earlier CLT/LIL findings for special cases. The methods merge harmonic analysis, Diophantine estimates, and probabilistic martingale techniques to quantify when Gaussian intuition persists.

Abstract

A classical observation in analysis asserts that lacunary systems of dilated functions show many properties which are also typical for systems of independent random variables. For example, if is a sequence of integers satisfying the Hadamard gap condition , then the normalized sums , considered on the probability space with Borel -field and Lebesgue measure, satisfy the central limit theorem (CLT) and the law of the iterated logarithm (LIL). Remarkably, the situation becomes much more deliacate when the trigonometric function is replaced by a more general 1-periodic function , and fine arithmetic properties of the sequence come into play. The most relevant arithmetic property can be phrased in terms of the number of solutions of certain 2-variable Diophantine equations. Recently, the authors proved that the validity of the LIL requires a strictly stronger Diophantine criterion than the CLT. In the present paper we show that this is only a special case of a wide-ranging general principle: there is a sharp cutoff, which can be expressed in form of a Diophantine criterion on the sequence , at which the tail probabilities of change from Gaussian to potentially erratic behavior. More precisely, let be the number of solutions of the equation , where . Roughly speaking, we prove: if for some , then is asymptotically is accordance with standard normal behavior for all up to . We also show that this criterion is optimal in the sense that under the same premises, the conclusion can fail to be true for values of beyond this threshold.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 7 theorems, 139 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $(g_N)_{N \in \mathop{\mathrm{\mathbb N}}\nolimits}$ be a sequence such that $1 \leq g_N \leq N$ for all $N\in\mathop{\mathrm{\mathbb N}}\nolimits$ and so that both $g_N$ and $\frac{N}{g_N}$ are monotone increasing in $N$ with $g_N \longrightarrow \infty$. Let $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ be a Let $\varepsilon > 0$. Then

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof
  • ...and 2 more