Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Normalized solutions to subcritical Choquard systems with double couplings

Wenliang Pei, Chonghao Deng

TL;DR

This work classifies normalized ground states for a coupled Choquard system with both linear and nonlinear couplings under mass constraints in dimensions $N\in\{3,4\}$ and nonlocal interactions governed by the Riesz potential with $2_{\alpha,*}=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}<p,q,r_1,r_2<2_{\alpha}^{*}=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}$. Employing a constrained variational framework on the $L^2$-torus $\mathcal{S}(\rho_1,\rho_2)$ and a Pohozaev manifold $\mathcal{P}_\beta(\rho_1,\rho_2)$ (with a decomposition into $\mathcal{P}_\beta^+, \mathcal{P}_\beta^-, \mathcal{P}_\beta^0$), the paper derives existence results for normalized ground states in both the symmetric case $r_1=r_2$ and the asymmetric case $r_1<r_2$. The analysis yields a rich classification across subcritical, critical, and supercritical regimes, including nonexistence in certain threshold scenarios and the realization of ground states as local minimizers or mountain-pass critical points, with positivity of the components and positive Lagrange multipliers. The results extend known single-Choquard and pure nonlinear-Coupled cases to a double-coupling nonlocal system, providing a comprehensive map of when normalized states exist under mass constraints and how the couplings influence the variational landscape.

Abstract

We consider the Choquard system with both linear and nonlinear couplings $-Δu + μ_1 u =λ_1 ( I_α* |u|^{r_1} ) |u|^{r_1-2} u + βp( I_α* |v|^q)|u|^{p-2} u + κv,$ $-Δv + μ_2 v =λ_2 ( I_α* |v|^{r_2} ) |v|^{r_2-2} v + βq( I_α* |u|^p)|v|^{q-2} v + κu , $ $\int_{\mathbb{R}^N} u^2 = ρ_1^2\, , \int_{\mathbb{R}^N} v^2 = ρ_2^2,$ where $N \in \{3,4\}$, $λ_1, λ_2, β, κ, ρ_1,ρ_2 > 0$, $2_{α,*} :=\frac{N+α}{N} <p,q , r_1, r_2 <2_α^*:=\frac{N+α}{N-2}$ and $p+q\leq 2r_1 \leq 2r_2$ . We investigate a classification result as the parameters $p+q$, $2r_1$ and $2r_2$ vary across the ranges $(\frac{2N+2α}{N},\frac{2N+2α+4}{N})$, $\{\frac{2N+2α+4}{N}\}$, and $(\frac{2N+2α+4}{N},\frac{2N+2α}{N-2})$. Employing variational methods, we demonstrate the existence of a normalized ground state for the system in the mass subcritical, critical, and supercritical cases.

Normalized solutions to subcritical Choquard systems with double couplings

TL;DR

This work classifies normalized ground states for a coupled Choquard system with both linear and nonlinear couplings under mass constraints in dimensions and nonlocal interactions governed by the Riesz potential with . Employing a constrained variational framework on the -torus and a Pohozaev manifold (with a decomposition into ), the paper derives existence results for normalized ground states in both the symmetric case and the asymmetric case . The analysis yields a rich classification across subcritical, critical, and supercritical regimes, including nonexistence in certain threshold scenarios and the realization of ground states as local minimizers or mountain-pass critical points, with positivity of the components and positive Lagrange multipliers. The results extend known single-Choquard and pure nonlinear-Coupled cases to a double-coupling nonlocal system, providing a comprehensive map of when normalized states exist under mass constraints and how the couplings influence the variational landscape.

Abstract

We consider the Choquard system with both linear and nonlinear couplings where , , and . We investigate a classification result as the parameters , and vary across the ranges , , and . Employing variational methods, we demonstrate the existence of a normalized ground state for the system in the mass subcritical, critical, and supercritical cases.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 30 sections, 30 theorems, 219 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume $N \in \{3,4\}$, $\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \beta, \kappa, \rho_1,\rho_2 > 0$ and $\frac{2N+2\alpha}{\alpha}<p+q\leq 2r_1=2r_2<\frac{2N+2\alpha+4}{N}$, then system system1.1 admits a normalized ground state $(u,v)$. Moreover,

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Theorem 1.10
  • ...and 34 more